▲ 655 ▼ These people are writing policies based off information they’re getting from ChatGPT (lemmy.world) submitted 2 days ago by cannedtuna@lemmy.world to c/microblogmemes@lemmy.world 88 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 child) Lmao. Your unflinting biological bias is hilarious. Even with the qualifier that is absurd permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) You’re right that it’s nowhere near 100% like I suggested. But ya, I wear that bias with pride. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 day ago (2 children) I get your bias, but in this instance the human experts he'd be listening to would be health insurance lobbyists, not people who care about others' health. ChatGPT, which is obviously incapable of feeling compassion, may very well have more compassion for human life compared to those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Natanael@infosec.pub 0 points 1 day ago Until those medical lobbyists pay OpenAI to make chatgpt give biased advice permalink fedilink source parent [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion that he’d be listening to only lobbyists. Theoretically, one could surround themselves with a diverse group of actual experts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Lmao. Taking trump and republicans over ai permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago Wow, that’s quite a jump. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 2 days ago (1 child) You’re right that it’s nowhere near 100% like I suggested. But ya, I wear that bias with pride. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 day ago (2 children) I get your bias, but in this instance the human experts he'd be listening to would be health insurance lobbyists, not people who care about others' health. ChatGPT, which is obviously incapable of feeling compassion, may very well have more compassion for human life compared to those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Natanael@infosec.pub 0 points 1 day ago Until those medical lobbyists pay OpenAI to make chatgpt give biased advice permalink fedilink source parent [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion that he’d be listening to only lobbyists. Theoretically, one could surround themselves with a diverse group of actual experts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Lmao. Taking trump and republicans over ai permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago Wow, that’s quite a jump. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 1 point 1 day ago (2 children) I get your bias, but in this instance the human experts he'd be listening to would be health insurance lobbyists, not people who care about others' health. ChatGPT, which is obviously incapable of feeling compassion, may very well have more compassion for human life compared to those. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Natanael@infosec.pub 0 points 1 day ago Until those medical lobbyists pay OpenAI to make chatgpt give biased advice permalink fedilink source parent [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion that he’d be listening to only lobbyists. Theoretically, one could surround themselves with a diverse group of actual experts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Lmao. Taking trump and republicans over ai permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago Wow, that’s quite a jump. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Natanael@infosec.pub 0 points 1 day ago Until those medical lobbyists pay OpenAI to make chatgpt give biased advice permalink fedilink source parent
[–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) I don’t think it’s a foregone conclusion that he’d be listening to only lobbyists. Theoretically, one could surround themselves with a diverse group of actual experts. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Lmao. Taking trump and republicans over ai permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago Wow, that’s quite a jump. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 child) Lmao. Taking trump and republicans over ai permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] blitzen@lemmy.ca 1 point 1 day ago Wow, that’s quite a jump. permalink fedilink source parent