submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
 

Why go for the cures right?
Paywalled source https://ft.trib.al/Uk6VCRG

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 78 points 1 week ago* (7 children)

I'm guessing it created it the same way i created a giant eight limbed creature called an Octophant, using a piece of paper and a pencil.

It does not make it exist.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    According to this non-paywalled article, it created thousands of potential genomes from which the scientists running the experiment chose three hundred promising candidates. They then had bacteria make those and used them for their bacteriophagy experiment. So essentially the AI made the blueprints that the scientists then turned into real stuff.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Let's get real here. Could the bacteria make my Octophant if I clean up the pencil lines?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (2 children)

    So the AI's role in all this, given that creating new viruses in a lab is already understood and well-practiced, was just to generate a list of virus configuration options (presumably working from existing examples), from which scientists had to discard ~90% of what the AI generated before moving on to the next step.

    Sounds like an attempt at a headline more than a genuine scientific effort.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago

    So the AI's role in this process, which is already known and well-practiced,

    Uh... no? Creating custom-made genomes for curing specific diseases isn't "known and well-practiced;" it's an area of active research.

    from which scientists had to discard ~90% of what the AI generated before moving on to the next step.

    That's basically in line with how AI is used in similar applications; even if most of what you get is busts AI can make so much stuff that it can compete with (or even outdo) other alternatives by sheer quantity. Sure someone has to filter out the useful stuff from the trash, but the very fact that it produces useful stuff makes it worth it. This method is well-established in other areas, so there's no reason to dismiss it here.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] [S] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Same question to you, why would you do this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

    Consider the military and industrial applications of the octophant.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

    [You Have Been Reported to the Raytheon Ethics Board]

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • A version of this came out of a DND campaign. They're called octen. Like oxen, but octen. They're like regular oxen, except they have eight legs. The legs have the same fur and color as cattle legs, but then bend up and move like a tarantula's.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    Yes and no. Going from a design to production takes remarkably little time these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    So you just scan his picture of an octophant and print it out and it exists? I'd bet you have a bunch of meat and no life. That said, please spend the time and effort into something more productive instead of a octophant was the point

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 week ago (1 child)

    That said, please spend the time and effort into something more productive

    Like curing antibiotic-resistant bacterial diseases? Because that's what the experiment was for.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

    An octophant is a bacterial disease? Lol

    And yes this experiment may be an absolutely stupid thing to do. Could it work out in a extremely well regulated extremely tight secure facility, sure.

    Is that happening, not in the U.S., we are cutting all the regulations and health precautions, so if what they create ever kills good bacteria as well during the tests, you should assume it will be spreading to the population.

    Why wasn't it contained? Our research grants were cut in half so we skipped on the precautions. Also the regulatory board no longer exists, and our OSHA equivalent hasn't stopped by in over 2 years. I think they may have shut down

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (2 children)

    Yes and no. Going from a design to production takes remarkably little time these days.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    Assuming that it will work from the first try

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 week ago (1 child)

    I mean, it's a known process.

    There's a YouTube channel called Thought Emporium.

    The guy used to do live streams were he designed custom DNA, and then ordered it from a lab that could produce it.

    It was a simple commercial transaction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 week ago

    I used to work in a wet lab. Agree, designing or multiplying DNA is not a problem. The problem is to make it stable and do what you intend it to do. This could be done only by allowing ai to control the whole process with minimal human interaction

  • source
  • parent