▲ 620 ▼ These three places all have about the same population size (lemmy.world) submitted 1 week ago by homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world to c/map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz 116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 104 points 1 week ago (2 children) Canada population: 41.4 million California population: 39.4 million Greater Tokyo Area: 37.4 million permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 week ago (1 child) Almost similar GDP as well Canada GDP (2026): $2.51 Trillion USD California GDP (2025): $4.25 Trillion USD Greater Tokyo Area (2022): $1.82 Trillion USD Wide Spread but still all in the low Trillions permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 week ago* (5 children) California is inflated by Silicon Valley stuff. Maybe left-over Hollywood prestige, as well. Japan isn't known for it's awesome economy, but it's surprising world city Tokyo is still doing worse than all of Canada including the backwaters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 child) California also offers an agricultural powerhouse of productivity, oceanfront tourism, and ongoing techbro circle jerks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) Oh right, a lot of produce that makes it up here is from California, although we've noticeably weaned off of it over the course of the trade war. I did mention the techbros. If the AI bubble pops, and geopolitics breaks the walled garden monopolies, it might end up a lot closer to Canada. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children) I wonder if you take out fossil fuel and logging out of Canada’s GDP if it still would be higher than Tokyo’s. Not much logging and oil drilling going on in Tokyo I reckon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago Add mining too. We export a lot of raw minerals permalink fedilink source parent [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it's a resource-based economy. Agriculture and mining are also huge. They're all kind of hard to get at resources, though, so it's not like the Persian Gulf, where there's no expenses and it's a money printer. Basically, outside of certain parts of Ontario, people work in that instead of in factories. (And forestry in particular is being imploded by the US, right now) Tokyo should, in theory, have all kinds of highly skilled professionals, who earn more than whatever logging grunt. But, the gap is still like 150%. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (1 child) Doing Worse is subjective. Higher GDP ≠ Doing Better. The US has some of the highest GDP per capita on earth but that doesn’t mean it (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) is doing well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (1 child) As in, doing worse economically. In this context, where that's clear, it seems like the wording holds up. (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) GDP measures actual trade more than the stock market. That being said, yes, it's a litmus test, albeit a decently well supported one. The main places it breaks down, in terms of predicting people's lifestyles, is where there's major banking hubs (Singapore, Seychelles, Ireland for a while). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) GDP is absolute values, so there's quite a bit of self reinforcement. Especially in service heavy areas, your massage cost 30$ for half an hour, elsewhere you can get a better one for 10$ an hour. Although the second economy delivered twice the goods at a higher quality, the economic output was 1/3rd permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it gets called a "litmus test". If it's higher you can be reasonably sure whatever place is richer (although banking hubs break that a bit). It itself doesn't correspond to that more than empirically, though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) It's not surprising because GDP does not reflect quality of life in any form whatsoever. GDP is not a measure of wealth it's a measure of feverish, extractive, mindless and destructive activity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* Sure, when you go to the store and buy food so you don't starve, that's mindless destructive activity. /s It's definitely not a measure of wealth, if you know what it is, because it's more of a proxy for income and productivity. And in the end, it correlates decently well with actual lifestyles. (Quality of life is more nebulous; there's miserable rich people and happy hut-dwellers) permalink fedilink source parent [–] farmgineer@nord.pub 3 points 1 week ago I wonder how they're determining what's in Tokyo for the GDP calculation. For example, companies' HQs there vs actual factories or whatever they own being elsewhere. permalink fedilink source parent [–] deft@lemmy.wtf 11 points 1 week ago (3 children) Biggest question. Who wins in a street fight. I wanna give it to the Canadians on sheer variety but I think California might win that one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 child) ninjas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 child) Canadian ninjas or Californian ninjas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago Surf Ninjas! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 child) 1000% California. So Cal is mostly LA and NorCal is a bunch of granola outdoor survival types. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children) I mean, we have plenty of people living off the land in Canada too, and it's hard land. If they're allowed bringing their guns, the Americans are going to win every time, of course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Routhinator@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago Canadians tend to become creative when they are at war. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Check out gun ownership stats for Canada sometime. Might surprise you. Lotta unregistered long guns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I live in a rural area; I'm aware. Although didn't Trudeau bring back the long gun registry? There's some pretty severe restrictions, like max 5 rounds in an SKS (although plenty of people illegally use the full 10). Cali does too, but it's not clear if it's on the same level. IIRC you can still have handguns pretty much anywhere in the US, while they're almost banned here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] deft@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 week ago* That's what I thought too but then I feel like California has more psychos. People don't talk about it but California is the true Florida man of the US. Florida just posts it in their newspaper more but Cali has some fucking weirdos And crazy beats tough any day of the weak. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website -1 points 1 week ago (1 child) You're in luck! We don't keep any of our guns in California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 days ago Yeah, those laws actually look fairly similar to Canada in extent. Some things are more lax, but some are actually stricter, like I'm pretty sure you can transport a long gun more easily in Canada. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (3 children) Considering California has Oakland and San Bernadino... I think California takes it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* Basically every town in the middle of the state. Stockton, Fresno, Merced, Bakersfield, permalink fedilink source parent [–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago Berdoo redneck checking in, honestly the Canadians have a solid chance still. Mostly because they are walking war crimes, we are more crimes against humanity. permalink fedilink source parent [+] arotrios@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 57 points 1 week ago (1 child) Almost similar GDP as well Canada GDP (2026): $2.51 Trillion USD California GDP (2025): $4.25 Trillion USD Greater Tokyo Area (2022): $1.82 Trillion USD Wide Spread but still all in the low Trillions permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 week ago* (5 children) California is inflated by Silicon Valley stuff. Maybe left-over Hollywood prestige, as well. Japan isn't known for it's awesome economy, but it's surprising world city Tokyo is still doing worse than all of Canada including the backwaters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 child) California also offers an agricultural powerhouse of productivity, oceanfront tourism, and ongoing techbro circle jerks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) Oh right, a lot of produce that makes it up here is from California, although we've noticeably weaned off of it over the course of the trade war. I did mention the techbros. If the AI bubble pops, and geopolitics breaks the walled garden monopolies, it might end up a lot closer to Canada. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children) I wonder if you take out fossil fuel and logging out of Canada’s GDP if it still would be higher than Tokyo’s. Not much logging and oil drilling going on in Tokyo I reckon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago Add mining too. We export a lot of raw minerals permalink fedilink source parent [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it's a resource-based economy. Agriculture and mining are also huge. They're all kind of hard to get at resources, though, so it's not like the Persian Gulf, where there's no expenses and it's a money printer. Basically, outside of certain parts of Ontario, people work in that instead of in factories. (And forestry in particular is being imploded by the US, right now) Tokyo should, in theory, have all kinds of highly skilled professionals, who earn more than whatever logging grunt. But, the gap is still like 150%. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (1 child) Doing Worse is subjective. Higher GDP ≠ Doing Better. The US has some of the highest GDP per capita on earth but that doesn’t mean it (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) is doing well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (1 child) As in, doing worse economically. In this context, where that's clear, it seems like the wording holds up. (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) GDP measures actual trade more than the stock market. That being said, yes, it's a litmus test, albeit a decently well supported one. The main places it breaks down, in terms of predicting people's lifestyles, is where there's major banking hubs (Singapore, Seychelles, Ireland for a while). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) GDP is absolute values, so there's quite a bit of self reinforcement. Especially in service heavy areas, your massage cost 30$ for half an hour, elsewhere you can get a better one for 10$ an hour. Although the second economy delivered twice the goods at a higher quality, the economic output was 1/3rd permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it gets called a "litmus test". If it's higher you can be reasonably sure whatever place is richer (although banking hubs break that a bit). It itself doesn't correspond to that more than empirically, though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) It's not surprising because GDP does not reflect quality of life in any form whatsoever. GDP is not a measure of wealth it's a measure of feverish, extractive, mindless and destructive activity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* Sure, when you go to the store and buy food so you don't starve, that's mindless destructive activity. /s It's definitely not a measure of wealth, if you know what it is, because it's more of a proxy for income and productivity. And in the end, it correlates decently well with actual lifestyles. (Quality of life is more nebulous; there's miserable rich people and happy hut-dwellers) permalink fedilink source parent [–] farmgineer@nord.pub 3 points 1 week ago I wonder how they're determining what's in Tokyo for the GDP calculation. For example, companies' HQs there vs actual factories or whatever they own being elsewhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 week ago* (5 children) California is inflated by Silicon Valley stuff. Maybe left-over Hollywood prestige, as well. Japan isn't known for it's awesome economy, but it's surprising world city Tokyo is still doing worse than all of Canada including the backwaters. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 child) California also offers an agricultural powerhouse of productivity, oceanfront tourism, and ongoing techbro circle jerks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) Oh right, a lot of produce that makes it up here is from California, although we've noticeably weaned off of it over the course of the trade war. I did mention the techbros. If the AI bubble pops, and geopolitics breaks the walled garden monopolies, it might end up a lot closer to Canada. permalink fedilink source parent [–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children) I wonder if you take out fossil fuel and logging out of Canada’s GDP if it still would be higher than Tokyo’s. Not much logging and oil drilling going on in Tokyo I reckon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago Add mining too. We export a lot of raw minerals permalink fedilink source parent [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it's a resource-based economy. Agriculture and mining are also huge. They're all kind of hard to get at resources, though, so it's not like the Persian Gulf, where there's no expenses and it's a money printer. Basically, outside of certain parts of Ontario, people work in that instead of in factories. (And forestry in particular is being imploded by the US, right now) Tokyo should, in theory, have all kinds of highly skilled professionals, who earn more than whatever logging grunt. But, the gap is still like 150%. permalink fedilink source parent [–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (1 child) Doing Worse is subjective. Higher GDP ≠ Doing Better. The US has some of the highest GDP per capita on earth but that doesn’t mean it (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) is doing well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (1 child) As in, doing worse economically. In this context, where that's clear, it seems like the wording holds up. (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) GDP measures actual trade more than the stock market. That being said, yes, it's a litmus test, albeit a decently well supported one. The main places it breaks down, in terms of predicting people's lifestyles, is where there's major banking hubs (Singapore, Seychelles, Ireland for a while). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) GDP is absolute values, so there's quite a bit of self reinforcement. Especially in service heavy areas, your massage cost 30$ for half an hour, elsewhere you can get a better one for 10$ an hour. Although the second economy delivered twice the goods at a higher quality, the economic output was 1/3rd permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it gets called a "litmus test". If it's higher you can be reasonably sure whatever place is richer (although banking hubs break that a bit). It itself doesn't correspond to that more than empirically, though. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) It's not surprising because GDP does not reflect quality of life in any form whatsoever. GDP is not a measure of wealth it's a measure of feverish, extractive, mindless and destructive activity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* Sure, when you go to the store and buy food so you don't starve, that's mindless destructive activity. /s It's definitely not a measure of wealth, if you know what it is, because it's more of a proxy for income and productivity. And in the end, it correlates decently well with actual lifestyles. (Quality of life is more nebulous; there's miserable rich people and happy hut-dwellers) permalink fedilink source parent [–] farmgineer@nord.pub 3 points 1 week ago I wonder how they're determining what's in Tokyo for the GDP calculation. For example, companies' HQs there vs actual factories or whatever they own being elsewhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (1 child) California also offers an agricultural powerhouse of productivity, oceanfront tourism, and ongoing techbro circle jerks. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) Oh right, a lot of produce that makes it up here is from California, although we've noticeably weaned off of it over the course of the trade war. I did mention the techbros. If the AI bubble pops, and geopolitics breaks the walled garden monopolies, it might end up a lot closer to Canada. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) Oh right, a lot of produce that makes it up here is from California, although we've noticeably weaned off of it over the course of the trade war. I did mention the techbros. If the AI bubble pops, and geopolitics breaks the walled garden monopolies, it might end up a lot closer to Canada. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children) I wonder if you take out fossil fuel and logging out of Canada’s GDP if it still would be higher than Tokyo’s. Not much logging and oil drilling going on in Tokyo I reckon. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago Add mining too. We export a lot of raw minerals permalink fedilink source parent [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it's a resource-based economy. Agriculture and mining are also huge. They're all kind of hard to get at resources, though, so it's not like the Persian Gulf, where there's no expenses and it's a money printer. Basically, outside of certain parts of Ontario, people work in that instead of in factories. (And forestry in particular is being imploded by the US, right now) Tokyo should, in theory, have all kinds of highly skilled professionals, who earn more than whatever logging grunt. But, the gap is still like 150%. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago Add mining too. We export a lot of raw minerals permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it's a resource-based economy. Agriculture and mining are also huge. They're all kind of hard to get at resources, though, so it's not like the Persian Gulf, where there's no expenses and it's a money printer. Basically, outside of certain parts of Ontario, people work in that instead of in factories. (And forestry in particular is being imploded by the US, right now) Tokyo should, in theory, have all kinds of highly skilled professionals, who earn more than whatever logging grunt. But, the gap is still like 150%. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (1 child) Doing Worse is subjective. Higher GDP ≠ Doing Better. The US has some of the highest GDP per capita on earth but that doesn’t mean it (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) is doing well. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (1 child) As in, doing worse economically. In this context, where that's clear, it seems like the wording holds up. (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) GDP measures actual trade more than the stock market. That being said, yes, it's a litmus test, albeit a decently well supported one. The main places it breaks down, in terms of predicting people's lifestyles, is where there's major banking hubs (Singapore, Seychelles, Ireland for a while). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) GDP is absolute values, so there's quite a bit of self reinforcement. Especially in service heavy areas, your massage cost 30$ for half an hour, elsewhere you can get a better one for 10$ an hour. Although the second economy delivered twice the goods at a higher quality, the economic output was 1/3rd permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it gets called a "litmus test". If it's higher you can be reasonably sure whatever place is richer (although banking hubs break that a bit). It itself doesn't correspond to that more than empirically, though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (1 child) As in, doing worse economically. In this context, where that's clear, it seems like the wording holds up. (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) GDP measures actual trade more than the stock market. That being said, yes, it's a litmus test, albeit a decently well supported one. The main places it breaks down, in terms of predicting people's lifestyles, is where there's major banking hubs (Singapore, Seychelles, Ireland for a while). permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) GDP is absolute values, so there's quite a bit of self reinforcement. Especially in service heavy areas, your massage cost 30$ for half an hour, elsewhere you can get a better one for 10$ an hour. Although the second economy delivered twice the goods at a higher quality, the economic output was 1/3rd permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it gets called a "litmus test". If it's higher you can be reasonably sure whatever place is richer (although banking hubs break that a bit). It itself doesn't correspond to that more than empirically, though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BlaestEgnen@feddit.dk 2 points 1 week ago (1 child) GDP is absolute values, so there's quite a bit of self reinforcement. Especially in service heavy areas, your massage cost 30$ for half an hour, elsewhere you can get a better one for 10$ an hour. Although the second economy delivered twice the goods at a higher quality, the economic output was 1/3rd permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it gets called a "litmus test". If it's higher you can be reasonably sure whatever place is richer (although banking hubs break that a bit). It itself doesn't correspond to that more than empirically, though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago Yes, it gets called a "litmus test". If it's higher you can be reasonably sure whatever place is richer (although banking hubs break that a bit). It itself doesn't correspond to that more than empirically, though. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) It's not surprising because GDP does not reflect quality of life in any form whatsoever. GDP is not a measure of wealth it's a measure of feverish, extractive, mindless and destructive activity. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* Sure, when you go to the store and buy food so you don't starve, that's mindless destructive activity. /s It's definitely not a measure of wealth, if you know what it is, because it's more of a proxy for income and productivity. And in the end, it correlates decently well with actual lifestyles. (Quality of life is more nebulous; there's miserable rich people and happy hut-dwellers) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* Sure, when you go to the store and buy food so you don't starve, that's mindless destructive activity. /s It's definitely not a measure of wealth, if you know what it is, because it's more of a proxy for income and productivity. And in the end, it correlates decently well with actual lifestyles. (Quality of life is more nebulous; there's miserable rich people and happy hut-dwellers) permalink fedilink source parent
[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 3 points 1 week ago I wonder how they're determining what's in Tokyo for the GDP calculation. For example, companies' HQs there vs actual factories or whatever they own being elsewhere. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 11 points 1 week ago (3 children) Biggest question. Who wins in a street fight. I wanna give it to the Canadians on sheer variety but I think California might win that one. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 child) ninjas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 child) Canadian ninjas or Californian ninjas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago Surf Ninjas! permalink fedilink source parent [–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 child) 1000% California. So Cal is mostly LA and NorCal is a bunch of granola outdoor survival types. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children) I mean, we have plenty of people living off the land in Canada too, and it's hard land. If they're allowed bringing their guns, the Americans are going to win every time, of course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Routhinator@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago Canadians tend to become creative when they are at war. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Check out gun ownership stats for Canada sometime. Might surprise you. Lotta unregistered long guns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I live in a rural area; I'm aware. Although didn't Trudeau bring back the long gun registry? There's some pretty severe restrictions, like max 5 rounds in an SKS (although plenty of people illegally use the full 10). Cali does too, but it's not clear if it's on the same level. IIRC you can still have handguns pretty much anywhere in the US, while they're almost banned here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] deft@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 week ago* That's what I thought too but then I feel like California has more psychos. People don't talk about it but California is the true Florida man of the US. Florida just posts it in their newspaper more but Cali has some fucking weirdos And crazy beats tough any day of the weak. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website -1 points 1 week ago (1 child) You're in luck! We don't keep any of our guns in California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 days ago Yeah, those laws actually look fairly similar to Canada in extent. Some things are more lax, but some are actually stricter, like I'm pretty sure you can transport a long gun more easily in Canada. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (3 children) Considering California has Oakland and San Bernadino... I think California takes it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* Basically every town in the middle of the state. Stockton, Fresno, Merced, Bakersfield, permalink fedilink source parent [–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago Berdoo redneck checking in, honestly the Canadians have a solid chance still. Mostly because they are walking war crimes, we are more crimes against humanity. permalink fedilink source parent [+] arotrios@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 child) ninjas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 child) Canadian ninjas or Californian ninjas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago Surf Ninjas! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago (1 child) Canadian ninjas or Californian ninjas? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago Surf Ninjas! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 11 points 1 week ago Surf Ninjas! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 child) 1000% California. So Cal is mostly LA and NorCal is a bunch of granola outdoor survival types. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children) I mean, we have plenty of people living off the land in Canada too, and it's hard land. If they're allowed bringing their guns, the Americans are going to win every time, of course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Routhinator@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago Canadians tend to become creative when they are at war. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Check out gun ownership stats for Canada sometime. Might surprise you. Lotta unregistered long guns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I live in a rural area; I'm aware. Although didn't Trudeau bring back the long gun registry? There's some pretty severe restrictions, like max 5 rounds in an SKS (although plenty of people illegally use the full 10). Cali does too, but it's not clear if it's on the same level. IIRC you can still have handguns pretty much anywhere in the US, while they're almost banned here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] deft@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 week ago* That's what I thought too but then I feel like California has more psychos. People don't talk about it but California is the true Florida man of the US. Florida just posts it in their newspaper more but Cali has some fucking weirdos And crazy beats tough any day of the weak. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website -1 points 1 week ago (1 child) You're in luck! We don't keep any of our guns in California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 days ago Yeah, those laws actually look fairly similar to Canada in extent. Some things are more lax, but some are actually stricter, like I'm pretty sure you can transport a long gun more easily in Canada. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children) I mean, we have plenty of people living off the land in Canada too, and it's hard land. If they're allowed bringing their guns, the Americans are going to win every time, of course. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] Routhinator@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago Canadians tend to become creative when they are at war. permalink fedilink source parent [–] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Check out gun ownership stats for Canada sometime. Might surprise you. Lotta unregistered long guns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I live in a rural area; I'm aware. Although didn't Trudeau bring back the long gun registry? There's some pretty severe restrictions, like max 5 rounds in an SKS (although plenty of people illegally use the full 10). Cali does too, but it's not clear if it's on the same level. IIRC you can still have handguns pretty much anywhere in the US, while they're almost banned here. permalink fedilink source parent [–] deft@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 week ago* That's what I thought too but then I feel like California has more psychos. People don't talk about it but California is the true Florida man of the US. Florida just posts it in their newspaper more but Cali has some fucking weirdos And crazy beats tough any day of the weak. permalink fedilink source parent [–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website -1 points 1 week ago (1 child) You're in luck! We don't keep any of our guns in California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 days ago Yeah, those laws actually look fairly similar to Canada in extent. Some things are more lax, but some are actually stricter, like I'm pretty sure you can transport a long gun more easily in Canada. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Routhinator@startrek.website 7 points 1 week ago Canadians tend to become creative when they are at war. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago (1 child) Check out gun ownership stats for Canada sometime. Might surprise you. Lotta unregistered long guns. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I live in a rural area; I'm aware. Although didn't Trudeau bring back the long gun registry? There's some pretty severe restrictions, like max 5 rounds in an SKS (although plenty of people illegally use the full 10). Cali does too, but it's not clear if it's on the same level. IIRC you can still have handguns pretty much anywhere in the US, while they're almost banned here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) I live in a rural area; I'm aware. Although didn't Trudeau bring back the long gun registry? There's some pretty severe restrictions, like max 5 rounds in an SKS (although plenty of people illegally use the full 10). Cali does too, but it's not clear if it's on the same level. IIRC you can still have handguns pretty much anywhere in the US, while they're almost banned here. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] deft@lemmy.wtf 3 points 1 week ago* That's what I thought too but then I feel like California has more psychos. People don't talk about it but California is the true Florida man of the US. Florida just posts it in their newspaper more but Cali has some fucking weirdos And crazy beats tough any day of the weak. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website -1 points 1 week ago (1 child) You're in luck! We don't keep any of our guns in California. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 days ago Yeah, those laws actually look fairly similar to Canada in extent. Some things are more lax, but some are actually stricter, like I'm pretty sure you can transport a long gun more easily in Canada. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 6 days ago Yeah, those laws actually look fairly similar to Canada in extent. Some things are more lax, but some are actually stricter, like I'm pretty sure you can transport a long gun more easily in Canada. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 4 points 1 week ago (3 children) Considering California has Oakland and San Bernadino... I think California takes it permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* Basically every town in the middle of the state. Stockton, Fresno, Merced, Bakersfield, permalink fedilink source parent [–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago Berdoo redneck checking in, honestly the Canadians have a solid chance still. Mostly because they are walking war crimes, we are more crimes against humanity. permalink fedilink source parent [+] arotrios@lemmy.world 1 point 1 week ago [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* Basically every town in the middle of the state. Stockton, Fresno, Merced, Bakersfield, permalink fedilink source parent
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago Berdoo redneck checking in, honestly the Canadians have a solid chance still. Mostly because they are walking war crimes, we are more crimes against humanity. permalink fedilink source parent