▲ 265 ▼ Storage upgrades cost too much, and we need microSD cards back (www.androidauthority.com) submitted 18 hours ago by sanitation@lemmy.today to c/android@lemmy.world 59 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 24 points 15 hours ago (5 children) Sony literally has one of the most waterproof phones. It is IP68 AND IP 65 rated (submersion and jets) which pretty much no other phones have. Headphone jack and SD card. It is a complete lie for profit. Just like getting rid of chargers without lowering the price. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] zzzxxx0110@piefed.social 1 point 4 hours ago* Exactly this! As someone who owns a Sony Xperia 1 VI, it's worth pointing out too that Sony managed to achieve this level of waterproof with a tool-less SIM/SD card tray too, which you can simply pull out the card tray with your finger, without having to use a pin. Sony likely chose this design because they wanted to market the Xperia phones to photography enthusiasts (as can be seen in their marketing), so they wanted make it quick and simple to swap the SD card between the phone and a PC for transferring photos, like when you're using a proper DLSR camera. And they've been using this tool-less tray design since the 2nd gen model that came out 6 years ago, it's a proven reliable design. So yeah waterproofing a phone really wasn't as hard as some of those manufecturers tried to suggest. There are many other companies who made waterproof phones with replaceable battery too with good IP rating.it was never a technology problem. permalink fedilink source parent [–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 4 points 14 hours ago Which one is that? If it's not bloated up with crapware it sounds like one on a future considerations list. permalink fedilink source parent [–] assa123@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago hi, sorry, which phone? permalink fedilink source parent [–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 1 point 12 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) It is IP68 AND IP 65 rated (submersion and jets) What does that mean? As far as I understand, IP ratings don't work like that. It's either IP65 or it's IP68. It can't be both. permalink fedilink source parent [–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 1 point 13 hours ago Water RESISTANT. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zzzxxx0110@piefed.social 1 point 4 hours ago* Exactly this! As someone who owns a Sony Xperia 1 VI, it's worth pointing out too that Sony managed to achieve this level of waterproof with a tool-less SIM/SD card tray too, which you can simply pull out the card tray with your finger, without having to use a pin. Sony likely chose this design because they wanted to market the Xperia phones to photography enthusiasts (as can be seen in their marketing), so they wanted make it quick and simple to swap the SD card between the phone and a PC for transferring photos, like when you're using a proper DLSR camera. And they've been using this tool-less tray design since the 2nd gen model that came out 6 years ago, it's a proven reliable design. So yeah waterproofing a phone really wasn't as hard as some of those manufecturers tried to suggest. There are many other companies who made waterproof phones with replaceable battery too with good IP rating.it was never a technology problem. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com 4 points 14 hours ago Which one is that? If it's not bloated up with crapware it sounds like one on a future considerations list. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] assa123@lemmy.world 0 points 8 hours ago hi, sorry, which phone? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 1 point 12 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) It is IP68 AND IP 65 rated (submersion and jets) What does that mean? As far as I understand, IP ratings don't work like that. It's either IP65 or it's IP68. It can't be both. permalink fedilink source parent