He would have had a lot better legal leg to stand on I think if he had just refused to give them any passcode. Now instead of a potential case of being forced to compel speech, he is facing what will be argued is an attempt to destroy evidence. His defense is probably a lot stronger with the former than the latter.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
replies:
load more comments
(2 replies)