▲ 1351 ▼ Hostile Architecturule (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 1 month ago by TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone [M] to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -37 points 1 month ago (7 children) Okay and what was gained by revealing the users names? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Rothe@piefed.social 85 points 1 month ago What was gained by censoring them? These are all public accounts, posting publicly on a public social network, what is the reason for censoring them? permalink fedilink source parent [–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 82 points 1 month ago (1 child) Well there's dates now too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) The "wear a mask" in the subway's username is a pretty obvious sign this was from pandemic days. I'm not sure what I gain by having more specific date information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Would be wild if it said 2016 though huh permalink fedilink source parent [–] TaTTe@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (1 child) I believe OP was referring to the word "fuck", which for some reason was censored in the original screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -13 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ooh, yeah didn't see that, only that oc didn't anonymize their submission like op did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why would they do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent [–] architect@thelemmy.club 52 points 1 month ago (1 child) Oh God forbid we verify anything anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* Yes, and the tweet can also be verified by searching its content, which will instantly lead to articles and uncensored names, completely nullifying the censoring. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago It’s a screenshot from publicly posted social media. Why the fuck would you clutch pearls on this one? permalink fedilink source parent [+] Stormy@thelemmy.club 14 points 1 month ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's not about entitlement, it's about decency. Knowing their usernames or identity contributes nothing here and nobody wants to be harassed when a screenshot of a conversation they casually participated in more than 5 years ago goes viral again for the umpteenth time. So the decent thing to do is to censor the usernames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) why is this downvoted? this is the common sense on the internet for ages permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago the decent thing to do is to censor Nope permalink fedilink source parent [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago people simply are. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago What was lost? That picture is all over the internet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 85 points 1 month ago What was gained by censoring them? These are all public accounts, posting publicly on a public social network, what is the reason for censoring them? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 82 points 1 month ago (1 child) Well there's dates now too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) The "wear a mask" in the subway's username is a pretty obvious sign this was from pandemic days. I'm not sure what I gain by having more specific date information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Would be wild if it said 2016 though huh permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) The "wear a mask" in the subway's username is a pretty obvious sign this was from pandemic days. I'm not sure what I gain by having more specific date information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Would be wild if it said 2016 though huh permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Would be wild if it said 2016 though huh permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TaTTe@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (1 child) I believe OP was referring to the word "fuck", which for some reason was censored in the original screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -13 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ooh, yeah didn't see that, only that oc didn't anonymize their submission like op did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why would they do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -13 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ooh, yeah didn't see that, only that oc didn't anonymize their submission like op did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why would they do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why would they do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] architect@thelemmy.club 52 points 1 month ago (1 child) Oh God forbid we verify anything anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* Yes, and the tweet can also be verified by searching its content, which will instantly lead to articles and uncensored names, completely nullifying the censoring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* Yes, and the tweet can also be verified by searching its content, which will instantly lead to articles and uncensored names, completely nullifying the censoring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago It’s a screenshot from publicly posted social media. Why the fuck would you clutch pearls on this one? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Stormy@thelemmy.club 14 points 1 month ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's not about entitlement, it's about decency. Knowing their usernames or identity contributes nothing here and nobody wants to be harassed when a screenshot of a conversation they casually participated in more than 5 years ago goes viral again for the umpteenth time. So the decent thing to do is to censor the usernames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) why is this downvoted? this is the common sense on the internet for ages permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago the decent thing to do is to censor Nope permalink fedilink source parent [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago people simply are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's not about entitlement, it's about decency. Knowing their usernames or identity contributes nothing here and nobody wants to be harassed when a screenshot of a conversation they casually participated in more than 5 years ago goes viral again for the umpteenth time. So the decent thing to do is to censor the usernames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) why is this downvoted? this is the common sense on the internet for ages permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago the decent thing to do is to censor Nope permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) why is this downvoted? this is the common sense on the internet for ages permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago the decent thing to do is to censor Nope permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago What was lost? That picture is all over the internet. permalink fedilink source parent