▲ 1351 ▼ Hostile Architecturule (lemmy.blahaj.zone) submitted 1 month ago by TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zone [M] to c/onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone 90 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Klear@piefed.world 362 points 1 month ago* (3 children) It took me about 15 seconds to find an uncensored version, and it has more pixels to boot. Fuck off with this this dumb censorship. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 88 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fresh, decentralised version for myself and others in the UK permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Klear@piefed.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children) Sorry. Is that still a thing? I wanted to avoid imgur, but I'm just so damn used to it =/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Not to worry, I just get it with a VPN and repost, that's how it is in the UK for now aha The 'Protect Children From Predators and All Forms of Human Nudity by Banning Everyone From Everything and Get a Generous Dose of Biometric Data Harvesting Normalised Act', or 'OSA', is still in effect permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Klear@piefed.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Huh. Here in Czech Republic we also enjoy hating on OSA, though in our case it's something like "Author Protection Association". Anti-piracy rather than internet blocking, but similar bullshit. We call it "osa zla", which literally means "The Axis of Evil". permalink fedilink source parent [–] snoons@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago There are alternative front ends you can use as well. Look in to LibRedirect. permalink fedilink source parent [–] qarbone@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago Censoring expletives is dumb. But I don't have a problem with hiding names of non-celebrities who aren't spouting hate. permalink fedilink source parent [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -37 points 1 month ago (7 children) Okay and what was gained by revealing the users names? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Rothe@piefed.social 85 points 1 month ago What was gained by censoring them? These are all public accounts, posting publicly on a public social network, what is the reason for censoring them? permalink fedilink source parent [–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 82 points 1 month ago (1 child) Well there's dates now too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) The "wear a mask" in the subway's username is a pretty obvious sign this was from pandemic days. I'm not sure what I gain by having more specific date information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Would be wild if it said 2016 though huh permalink fedilink source parent [–] TaTTe@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (1 child) I believe OP was referring to the word "fuck", which for some reason was censored in the original screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -13 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ooh, yeah didn't see that, only that oc didn't anonymize their submission like op did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why would they do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent [–] architect@thelemmy.club 52 points 1 month ago (1 child) Oh God forbid we verify anything anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* Yes, and the tweet can also be verified by searching its content, which will instantly lead to articles and uncensored names, completely nullifying the censoring. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago It’s a screenshot from publicly posted social media. Why the fuck would you clutch pearls on this one? permalink fedilink source parent [+] Stormy@thelemmy.club 14 points 1 month ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's not about entitlement, it's about decency. Knowing their usernames or identity contributes nothing here and nobody wants to be harassed when a screenshot of a conversation they casually participated in more than 5 years ago goes viral again for the umpteenth time. So the decent thing to do is to censor the usernames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) why is this downvoted? this is the common sense on the internet for ages permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago the decent thing to do is to censor Nope permalink fedilink source parent [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago people simply are. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago What was lost? That picture is all over the internet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 88 points 1 month ago (1 child) Fresh, decentralised version for myself and others in the UK permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Klear@piefed.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children) Sorry. Is that still a thing? I wanted to avoid imgur, but I'm just so damn used to it =/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Not to worry, I just get it with a VPN and repost, that's how it is in the UK for now aha The 'Protect Children From Predators and All Forms of Human Nudity by Banning Everyone From Everything and Get a Generous Dose of Biometric Data Harvesting Normalised Act', or 'OSA', is still in effect permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Klear@piefed.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Huh. Here in Czech Republic we also enjoy hating on OSA, though in our case it's something like "Author Protection Association". Anti-piracy rather than internet blocking, but similar bullshit. We call it "osa zla", which literally means "The Axis of Evil". permalink fedilink source parent [–] snoons@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago There are alternative front ends you can use as well. Look in to LibRedirect. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@piefed.world 14 points 1 month ago (2 children) Sorry. Is that still a thing? I wanted to avoid imgur, but I'm just so damn used to it =/ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Not to worry, I just get it with a VPN and repost, that's how it is in the UK for now aha The 'Protect Children From Predators and All Forms of Human Nudity by Banning Everyone From Everything and Get a Generous Dose of Biometric Data Harvesting Normalised Act', or 'OSA', is still in effect permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Klear@piefed.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Huh. Here in Czech Republic we also enjoy hating on OSA, though in our case it's something like "Author Protection Association". Anti-piracy rather than internet blocking, but similar bullshit. We call it "osa zla", which literally means "The Axis of Evil". permalink fedilink source parent [–] snoons@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago There are alternative front ends you can use as well. Look in to LibRedirect. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Not to worry, I just get it with a VPN and repost, that's how it is in the UK for now aha The 'Protect Children From Predators and All Forms of Human Nudity by Banning Everyone From Everything and Get a Generous Dose of Biometric Data Harvesting Normalised Act', or 'OSA', is still in effect permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Klear@piefed.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Huh. Here in Czech Republic we also enjoy hating on OSA, though in our case it's something like "Author Protection Association". Anti-piracy rather than internet blocking, but similar bullshit. We call it "osa zla", which literally means "The Axis of Evil". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@piefed.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) Huh. Here in Czech Republic we also enjoy hating on OSA, though in our case it's something like "Author Protection Association". Anti-piracy rather than internet blocking, but similar bullshit. We call it "osa zla", which literally means "The Axis of Evil". permalink fedilink source parent
[–] snoons@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago There are alternative front ends you can use as well. Look in to LibRedirect. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago Censoring expletives is dumb. But I don't have a problem with hiding names of non-celebrities who aren't spouting hate. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -37 points 1 month ago (7 children) Okay and what was gained by revealing the users names? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 14 child comments replies: [–] Rothe@piefed.social 85 points 1 month ago What was gained by censoring them? These are all public accounts, posting publicly on a public social network, what is the reason for censoring them? permalink fedilink source parent [–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 82 points 1 month ago (1 child) Well there's dates now too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) The "wear a mask" in the subway's username is a pretty obvious sign this was from pandemic days. I'm not sure what I gain by having more specific date information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Would be wild if it said 2016 though huh permalink fedilink source parent [–] TaTTe@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (1 child) I believe OP was referring to the word "fuck", which for some reason was censored in the original screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -13 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ooh, yeah didn't see that, only that oc didn't anonymize their submission like op did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why would they do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent [–] architect@thelemmy.club 52 points 1 month ago (1 child) Oh God forbid we verify anything anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* Yes, and the tweet can also be verified by searching its content, which will instantly lead to articles and uncensored names, completely nullifying the censoring. permalink fedilink source parent [–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago It’s a screenshot from publicly posted social media. Why the fuck would you clutch pearls on this one? permalink fedilink source parent [+] Stormy@thelemmy.club 14 points 1 month ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's not about entitlement, it's about decency. Knowing their usernames or identity contributes nothing here and nobody wants to be harassed when a screenshot of a conversation they casually participated in more than 5 years ago goes viral again for the umpteenth time. So the decent thing to do is to censor the usernames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) why is this downvoted? this is the common sense on the internet for ages permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago the decent thing to do is to censor Nope permalink fedilink source parent [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago people simply are. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Klear@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago What was lost? That picture is all over the internet. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Rothe@piefed.social 85 points 1 month ago What was gained by censoring them? These are all public accounts, posting publicly on a public social network, what is the reason for censoring them? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] craftrabbit@lemmy.zip 82 points 1 month ago (1 child) Well there's dates now too permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) The "wear a mask" in the subway's username is a pretty obvious sign this was from pandemic days. I'm not sure what I gain by having more specific date information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Would be wild if it said 2016 though huh permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GalacticSushi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) The "wear a mask" in the subway's username is a pretty obvious sign this was from pandemic days. I'm not sure what I gain by having more specific date information. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Would be wild if it said 2016 though huh permalink fedilink source parent
[–] zikzak025@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago Would be wild if it said 2016 though huh permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TaTTe@lemmy.world 64 points 1 month ago (1 child) I believe OP was referring to the word "fuck", which for some reason was censored in the original screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -13 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ooh, yeah didn't see that, only that oc didn't anonymize their submission like op did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why would they do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -13 points 1 month ago (1 child) Ooh, yeah didn't see that, only that oc didn't anonymize their submission like op did. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why would they do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 child) Why would they do that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] DmMacniel@feddit.org -10 points 1 month ago (2 children) common courtesy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent [–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 child) A snapshot of public discourse on a public forum is not doxing. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) did I say that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago Basically, yes. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago Common courtesy for what, exactly? These were publicly posted on a public website on a public forum. If they didn't want people to see what they posted, they probably should have posted a private message on a private website on a private forum? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] architect@thelemmy.club 52 points 1 month ago (1 child) Oh God forbid we verify anything anymore. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* Yes, and the tweet can also be verified by searching its content, which will instantly lead to articles and uncensored names, completely nullifying the censoring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lyralycan@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago* Yes, and the tweet can also be verified by searching its content, which will instantly lead to articles and uncensored names, completely nullifying the censoring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago It’s a screenshot from publicly posted social media. Why the fuck would you clutch pearls on this one? permalink fedilink source parent
[+] Stormy@thelemmy.club 14 points 1 month ago (2 children) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's not about entitlement, it's about decency. Knowing their usernames or identity contributes nothing here and nobody wants to be harassed when a screenshot of a conversation they casually participated in more than 5 years ago goes viral again for the umpteenth time. So the decent thing to do is to censor the usernames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) why is this downvoted? this is the common sense on the internet for ages permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago the decent thing to do is to censor Nope permalink fedilink source parent [–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 0 points 1 month ago people simply are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 13 points 1 month ago* (2 children) It's not about entitlement, it's about decency. Knowing their usernames or identity contributes nothing here and nobody wants to be harassed when a screenshot of a conversation they casually participated in more than 5 years ago goes viral again for the umpteenth time. So the decent thing to do is to censor the usernames. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) why is this downvoted? this is the common sense on the internet for ages permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent [–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago the decent thing to do is to censor Nope permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wopalopa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago (1 child) why is this downvoted? this is the common sense on the internet for ages permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] exu@feditown.com 7 points 1 month ago (2 children) Anything you post publicly can and will be used against you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent [–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cadmiumsandbox@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago amazing argument there. lets argue against changing any behavior even the most minor and justify it with its just like this permalink fedilink source parent
[–] SpaceCadet@feddit.nl 1 point 1 month ago* That doesn't mean you should complicit in that, dipshit. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 0x0@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 month ago the decent thing to do is to censor Nope permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Klear@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago What was lost? That picture is all over the internet. permalink fedilink source parent