▲ 1 ▼ Where there people in the 1980's who refused to call 3.5" floppy disks floppy disks? (cake.kobel.fyi) submitted 1 month ago by squirrel@cake.kobel.fyi to c/ask@piefed.social 19 comments fedilink hide all child comments Compared to 5.25" and 8" floppy disks, the 3.5" weren't very floppy. They didn't bend that easily, were stiff compared to the older formats. Paragraph from Wikipedia: Generally, the term floppy disk persisted, even though later style floppy disks have a rigid case around an internal floppy disk. Where there people who refused to call 3.5" floppy disks floppy disks because they weren't floppy enough?
[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) They were also square. We still called them "discs". permalink fedilink source hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] teft@piefed.social 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) The disc inside is still round though. Did you never crack one open to see? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 month ago Of course I did. OP is asking if our description matched the inside or the outside, I'm giving further evidence that the (rigid, square) casing didn't affect that description. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] teft@piefed.social 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) The disc inside is still round though. Did you never crack one open to see? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 month ago Of course I did. OP is asking if our description matched the inside or the outside, I'm giving further evidence that the (rigid, square) casing didn't affect that description. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nemo@slrpnk.net 1 point 1 month ago Of course I did. OP is asking if our description matched the inside or the outside, I'm giving further evidence that the (rigid, square) casing didn't affect that description. permalink fedilink source parent