▲ 558 ▼ Men against bush (feddit.dk) submitted 1 month ago by stenAanden@feddit.dk to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 283 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago (3 children) Is it wrong to prefer clean shaven now????? permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (3 children) If you watched the video, she is very specifically talking about men who are commenting about women’s body hair publicly. You can have a preference without telling random women they should shave because it’s your personal preference. I have a preference for trimmed or hairy, but I don’t tell people that they must quit shaving because I find it more attractive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) How did you watch a video? I only see an un-attributed blurry screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago OP linked it in a comment when they first posted and encouraged people to watch it: youtube.com/watch?v=OfSvnaMS7KI&pp=ygUSTWVuIHRoYXQgaGF0ZSBidXN2 permalink fedilink source parent [–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) wait I genuinely thought she was talking about president bush and I tried making a joke lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago Maybe I'm the weird one for always reading all of the comments in a post haha. OP posted the video in a comment and it was immediately clear that this lady was talking about men judging women's body hair publicly. The Bush jokes seemed like low hanging fruit that no one could resist. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago Who the heck calls body hair bush is my question then?! permalink fedilink source parent [–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) Having a preference for A over B is not the same thing as hating B. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) On October 23rd, 2017, [Twitter] user @BravoCoolee made a post that read, "Twitter the only place where well-articulated sentences still get misinterpreted. You can say “I like pancakes” and somebody will say “So you hate waffles?” No bitch. Dats a whole new sentence. Wtf is you talkin about." https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/no-bitch-dats-a-whole-new-x-wtf-is-you-talkin-about permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Sadly the twitter is not the only place that happens. It's everywhere permalink fedilink source parent [+] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world -22 points 1 month ago (1 child) no, but considering the types of females that have no hair down there tend to be prepubecent (or have alopecia,) or the women who are concerned about early detection of STI's, it does imply a kind of coding about the men who prefer it, rather than having no preference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Females and men. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice. Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) There was no need to use "females" at all in that sentence structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* It's supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i'm calling out mysogyny. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (3 children) If you watched the video, she is very specifically talking about men who are commenting about women’s body hair publicly. You can have a preference without telling random women they should shave because it’s your personal preference. I have a preference for trimmed or hairy, but I don’t tell people that they must quit shaving because I find it more attractive. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) How did you watch a video? I only see an un-attributed blurry screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago OP linked it in a comment when they first posted and encouraged people to watch it: youtube.com/watch?v=OfSvnaMS7KI&pp=ygUSTWVuIHRoYXQgaGF0ZSBidXN2 permalink fedilink source parent [–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) wait I genuinely thought she was talking about president bush and I tried making a joke lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago Maybe I'm the weird one for always reading all of the comments in a post haha. OP posted the video in a comment and it was immediately clear that this lady was talking about men judging women's body hair publicly. The Bush jokes seemed like low hanging fruit that no one could resist. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago Who the heck calls body hair bush is my question then?! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) How did you watch a video? I only see an un-attributed blurry screenshot. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago OP linked it in a comment when they first posted and encouraged people to watch it: youtube.com/watch?v=OfSvnaMS7KI&pp=ygUSTWVuIHRoYXQgaGF0ZSBidXN2 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago OP linked it in a comment when they first posted and encouraged people to watch it: youtube.com/watch?v=OfSvnaMS7KI&pp=ygUSTWVuIHRoYXQgaGF0ZSBidXN2 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 87Six@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) wait I genuinely thought she was talking about president bush and I tried making a joke lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago Maybe I'm the weird one for always reading all of the comments in a post haha. OP posted the video in a comment and it was immediately clear that this lady was talking about men judging women's body hair publicly. The Bush jokes seemed like low hanging fruit that no one could resist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago Maybe I'm the weird one for always reading all of the comments in a post haha. OP posted the video in a comment and it was immediately clear that this lady was talking about men judging women's body hair publicly. The Bush jokes seemed like low hanging fruit that no one could resist. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 point 1 month ago Who the heck calls body hair bush is my question then?! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] NewSocialWhoDis@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago (1 child) Having a preference for A over B is not the same thing as hating B. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) On October 23rd, 2017, [Twitter] user @BravoCoolee made a post that read, "Twitter the only place where well-articulated sentences still get misinterpreted. You can say “I like pancakes” and somebody will say “So you hate waffles?” No bitch. Dats a whole new sentence. Wtf is you talkin about." https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/no-bitch-dats-a-whole-new-x-wtf-is-you-talkin-about permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Sadly the twitter is not the only place that happens. It's everywhere permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ShaggySnacks@lemmy.myserv.one 11 points 1 month ago (1 child) On October 23rd, 2017, [Twitter] user @BravoCoolee made a post that read, "Twitter the only place where well-articulated sentences still get misinterpreted. You can say “I like pancakes” and somebody will say “So you hate waffles?” No bitch. Dats a whole new sentence. Wtf is you talkin about." https://knowyourmeme.com/memes/no-bitch-dats-a-whole-new-x-wtf-is-you-talkin-about permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Sadly the twitter is not the only place that happens. It's everywhere permalink fedilink source parent
[–] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago Sadly the twitter is not the only place that happens. It's everywhere permalink fedilink source parent
[+] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world -22 points 1 month ago (1 child) no, but considering the types of females that have no hair down there tend to be prepubecent (or have alopecia,) or the women who are concerned about early detection of STI's, it does imply a kind of coding about the men who prefer it, rather than having no preference. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Females and men. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice. Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) There was no need to use "females" at all in that sentence structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* It's supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i'm calling out mysogyny. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Females and men. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice. Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) There was no need to use "females" at all in that sentence structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* It's supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i'm calling out mysogyny. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice. Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) There was no need to use "females" at all in that sentence structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* It's supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i'm calling out mysogyny. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) There was no need to use "females" at all in that sentence structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* It's supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i'm calling out mysogyny. permalink fedilink source parent