▲ 558 ▼ Men against bush (feddit.dk) submitted 1 month ago by stenAanden@feddit.dk to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 283 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) Females and men. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice. Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) There was no need to use "females" at all in that sentence structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* It's supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i'm calling out mysogyny. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wabasso@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children) I was about to agree with you but I reread it. Women is used as well, and the sentence that uses females is about their biology not choice. Still not accepting the argument about the implication on men’s coding though. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) There was no need to use "females" at all in that sentence structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* It's supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i'm calling out mysogyny. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] velma@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago (1 child) There was no need to use "females" at all in that sentence structure. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) It's literally the subject of the thread. taps title also, how would you describe a non adult person with two x chromosomes? There's no such thing as a prepubescent "woman." That's an oxymoron. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheStaffmaster@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago* It's supported farther down as a indicator that the man sees women as equating to children, or sees the woman as permiscuous. I promise you that in either case, i'm calling out mysogyny. permalink fedilink source parent