▲ 53 ▼ What is the best privacy focused search engine? (sh.itjust.works) submitted 2 years ago by EdherJr@sh.itjust.works to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 59 comments fedilink hide all child comments Preferably one that doesn't censor search results. Like DuckDuckGo, apparently
[–] BuddyTheBeefalo@lemmy.ml 40 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children) The far right complains after the search engine DuckDuckGo vows to limit Russian propaganda. Misconceptions About DuckDuckGo: Did DuckDuckGo censor search results about the Russia-Ukraine war? permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] gullible@kbin.social 34 points 2 years ago* This was particularly visible on far right subreddits where they began heavily recommending yandex. Because that makes sense. Swapping from a privacy-centric search engine to a literal Russian propaganda conveyor belt? Yeah, sure. No clue how many bit the bait. permalink fedilink source parent [–] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago Thanks for the context info. Saved me a search for it. permalink fedilink source parent [–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Censorship of any kind is bad because it sets a bad precedent. There's a reason why the ACLU defended the KKK's freedom of speech in 1978. If you can censor one, you can censor all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mojo@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago No it's not lol permalink fedilink source parent [–] hackris@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago While I am not far right and don't support Russia in this conflict, it's still very wrong to censor anything political. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gullible@kbin.social 34 points 2 years ago* This was particularly visible on far right subreddits where they began heavily recommending yandex. Because that makes sense. Swapping from a privacy-centric search engine to a literal Russian propaganda conveyor belt? Yeah, sure. No clue how many bit the bait. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago Thanks for the context info. Saved me a search for it. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] eya@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 years ago (1 child) Censorship of any kind is bad because it sets a bad precedent. There's a reason why the ACLU defended the KKK's freedom of speech in 1978. If you can censor one, you can censor all. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] mojo@lemm.ee -1 points 2 years ago No it's not lol permalink fedilink source parent
[–] hackris@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago While I am not far right and don't support Russia in this conflict, it's still very wrong to censor anything political. permalink fedilink source parent