498
this is some sad shit (sh.itjust.works)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
121 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

*edited

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 0 points 7 months ago (1 child)

Llm as a bank of stolen work from great artists has it

This is what I'm talking about. Not all LLMs are based on stolen works. Pick the worst and pretend that's all of it.

The radicalism is bad but it's inevitable since most people are trying to sell it as something that it is not.

But we all (most of us) know what they are selling doesn't exist. We know they are full of shit.

There is no reason to bring it up for this discuss other than the glee from beating a dead horse.

They don't care if I'm getting better or learning anything, but that I'm outputting something faster and costing them less.

This is true of any shit employer. LLMs isn't the cause of this behavior.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 1 point 7 months ago (1 child)

    You seem to be ignoring some stuff specific to llms, but anyway I'm curious; which graphical llm is not based in other people's work?

    Perhaps stolen was a strong term, but they are all based on other people's work right? When I used it I could clearly see the styles of some artists it was trained on.

    I'm curious about that but even if it's magically original to me that's is still only useful to look at someone else's work, even if is a computer work. It's not a tool in itself I can master and improve my work.

    Like fluid simulation for instance. You can light and render it well, but you can't fully control it, because you're not the one making it. When I need a very specific splash for a render I need to manually model it. And then llm is even worse because it controls the whole thing by itself.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •