you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 30 points 8 months ago (3 children)

The sad thing is, that's not even true.

Most poor world be better off under left wing ideals, yet they vote right wing anyway because they're scared that brown people will steal their crumbs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 8 months ago* (2 children)

    (But actually that guy in the middle doesn't just have this plate full of cookies. He owns a huge vessel full of cookies)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 8 months ago

    There’s a twisted sort of logic to this. Let’s put ourselves in the position of that worker with one cookie for a second.

    Two things are true in America:

    1. the rich don’t pay taxes
    2. benefits cost money

    If the worker feels caught between those two things, he has to ask which he can change more easily. And clearly, denying benefits to the poor is easier than taxing the rich. In today’s climate, there is a “deny benefits to the poor” party that is very well mobilized and has delivered numerous victories. And where is the “tax the rich” option? Nowhere.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

    But rich white men stealing their crumbs is fine because they aren't brown

    Better than Jose over there, a hard working fine gentleman, getting his needs met

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 8 months ago

    It is true for the general disposition. Do you vote in your own interests vs do you vote in the general best interest. Your motivations may be malicious or incompetent, a two party system doesn't discern.

  • source
  • parent