▲ 451 ▼ Hillary Clinton Says Young Americans Are Pro-Palestine Because They Watch ‘Totally Made Up’ Videos of Gaza Horrors (www.mediaite.com) submitted 8 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world 131 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] nondescripthandle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 86 points 8 months ago (2 children) Reminding us how Trump won I see. Glad she opened her mouth, too many people are still trying to lionize her. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] phed@lemmy.ml 42 points 8 months ago (2 children) It was a bad decision to even put her up as a candidate. She had been demonized by the right for years prior to the election. They literally polarized the entire right to vote against her. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago (2 children) That's completely irrelevant, they demonize every Dem. It was a bad decision to put her up as a candidate because she's a giant asshole and not a talented enough liar to cover it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] human@slrpnk.net 19 points 8 months ago (1 child) Exactly. Trump didn't win by courting centrists. He energized entirely new voters (albeit with racism). Democrats insist that perpetually leaning further into corporatism and imperialism and abandoning marginalized groups like trans people and immigrants will win the "likely voters". A real winning strategy would be to have policies that actually inspire people and turn out new voters. That would assume they actually want what they say they want though, instead of being controlled opposition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) Really it’s corporate Democrats trying to court corporate donors. It has close to nothing to do with this being the policy to win over voters. Imo, it’s why the corporate Dems need to be primaried out by progressives. A corporate Dem is still a marginally better than having Republicans in office, only because they’re focused on personal greed rather than personally causing the pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Indeed. Gulags of work are more inclusive with a Dem. The boot is a wide boot crushing everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Corporate Dems care enough that you’re not starving, but not enough so that you’re not living out of your car or relying on the government for some of your needs. Many of the Corporate Dems probably do care to an extent, but green is what matters most to many so if you have a pulse it’s okay! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago Indeed, they care to an extent. They have even devised tests to see how much they should care. They are very measured with their caring. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wookiepedia@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago she's a giant asshole and not a talented enough liar to cover it up. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago They demonize zorhan as well, the problem is Clinton (like 95% of the republicans) simply believes whatever her donors tell her. permalink fedilink source parent [–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 8 points 8 months ago (1 child) she was always the "lesser of the evils" candidate. For once the dems need to actually give us a good non-corporate fueled, actually, socially aware and empathetic, candidate. Otherwise the party is done and its probably for the best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] tym@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] phed@lemmy.ml 42 points 8 months ago (2 children) It was a bad decision to even put her up as a candidate. She had been demonized by the right for years prior to the election. They literally polarized the entire right to vote against her. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago (2 children) That's completely irrelevant, they demonize every Dem. It was a bad decision to put her up as a candidate because she's a giant asshole and not a talented enough liar to cover it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] human@slrpnk.net 19 points 8 months ago (1 child) Exactly. Trump didn't win by courting centrists. He energized entirely new voters (albeit with racism). Democrats insist that perpetually leaning further into corporatism and imperialism and abandoning marginalized groups like trans people and immigrants will win the "likely voters". A real winning strategy would be to have policies that actually inspire people and turn out new voters. That would assume they actually want what they say they want though, instead of being controlled opposition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) Really it’s corporate Democrats trying to court corporate donors. It has close to nothing to do with this being the policy to win over voters. Imo, it’s why the corporate Dems need to be primaried out by progressives. A corporate Dem is still a marginally better than having Republicans in office, only because they’re focused on personal greed rather than personally causing the pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Indeed. Gulags of work are more inclusive with a Dem. The boot is a wide boot crushing everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Corporate Dems care enough that you’re not starving, but not enough so that you’re not living out of your car or relying on the government for some of your needs. Many of the Corporate Dems probably do care to an extent, but green is what matters most to many so if you have a pulse it’s okay! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago Indeed, they care to an extent. They have even devised tests to see how much they should care. They are very measured with their caring. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wookiepedia@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago she's a giant asshole and not a talented enough liar to cover it up. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago They demonize zorhan as well, the problem is Clinton (like 95% of the republicans) simply believes whatever her donors tell her. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago (2 children) That's completely irrelevant, they demonize every Dem. It was a bad decision to put her up as a candidate because she's a giant asshole and not a talented enough liar to cover it up. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] human@slrpnk.net 19 points 8 months ago (1 child) Exactly. Trump didn't win by courting centrists. He energized entirely new voters (albeit with racism). Democrats insist that perpetually leaning further into corporatism and imperialism and abandoning marginalized groups like trans people and immigrants will win the "likely voters". A real winning strategy would be to have policies that actually inspire people and turn out new voters. That would assume they actually want what they say they want though, instead of being controlled opposition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) Really it’s corporate Democrats trying to court corporate donors. It has close to nothing to do with this being the policy to win over voters. Imo, it’s why the corporate Dems need to be primaried out by progressives. A corporate Dem is still a marginally better than having Republicans in office, only because they’re focused on personal greed rather than personally causing the pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Indeed. Gulags of work are more inclusive with a Dem. The boot is a wide boot crushing everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Corporate Dems care enough that you’re not starving, but not enough so that you’re not living out of your car or relying on the government for some of your needs. Many of the Corporate Dems probably do care to an extent, but green is what matters most to many so if you have a pulse it’s okay! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago Indeed, they care to an extent. They have even devised tests to see how much they should care. They are very measured with their caring. permalink fedilink source parent [–] wookiepedia@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago she's a giant asshole and not a talented enough liar to cover it up. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] human@slrpnk.net 19 points 8 months ago (1 child) Exactly. Trump didn't win by courting centrists. He energized entirely new voters (albeit with racism). Democrats insist that perpetually leaning further into corporatism and imperialism and abandoning marginalized groups like trans people and immigrants will win the "likely voters". A real winning strategy would be to have policies that actually inspire people and turn out new voters. That would assume they actually want what they say they want though, instead of being controlled opposition. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) Really it’s corporate Democrats trying to court corporate donors. It has close to nothing to do with this being the policy to win over voters. Imo, it’s why the corporate Dems need to be primaried out by progressives. A corporate Dem is still a marginally better than having Republicans in office, only because they’re focused on personal greed rather than personally causing the pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Indeed. Gulags of work are more inclusive with a Dem. The boot is a wide boot crushing everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Corporate Dems care enough that you’re not starving, but not enough so that you’re not living out of your car or relying on the government for some of your needs. Many of the Corporate Dems probably do care to an extent, but green is what matters most to many so if you have a pulse it’s okay! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago Indeed, they care to an extent. They have even devised tests to see how much they should care. They are very measured with their caring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 6 points 8 months ago (1 child) Really it’s corporate Democrats trying to court corporate donors. It has close to nothing to do with this being the policy to win over voters. Imo, it’s why the corporate Dems need to be primaried out by progressives. A corporate Dem is still a marginally better than having Republicans in office, only because they’re focused on personal greed rather than personally causing the pain. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Indeed. Gulags of work are more inclusive with a Dem. The boot is a wide boot crushing everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Corporate Dems care enough that you’re not starving, but not enough so that you’re not living out of your car or relying on the government for some of your needs. Many of the Corporate Dems probably do care to an extent, but green is what matters most to many so if you have a pulse it’s okay! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago Indeed, they care to an extent. They have even devised tests to see how much they should care. They are very measured with their caring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Indeed. Gulags of work are more inclusive with a Dem. The boot is a wide boot crushing everyone. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Corporate Dems care enough that you’re not starving, but not enough so that you’re not living out of your car or relying on the government for some of your needs. Many of the Corporate Dems probably do care to an extent, but green is what matters most to many so if you have a pulse it’s okay! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago Indeed, they care to an extent. They have even devised tests to see how much they should care. They are very measured with their caring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 months ago (1 child) Corporate Dems care enough that you’re not starving, but not enough so that you’re not living out of your car or relying on the government for some of your needs. Many of the Corporate Dems probably do care to an extent, but green is what matters most to many so if you have a pulse it’s okay! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago Indeed, they care to an extent. They have even devised tests to see how much they should care. They are very measured with their caring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] jollyrogue@lemmy.ml 1 point 8 months ago Indeed, they care to an extent. They have even devised tests to see how much they should care. They are very measured with their caring. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] wookiepedia@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago she's a giant asshole and not a talented enough liar to cover it up. I would like to subscribe to your newsletter. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago They demonize zorhan as well, the problem is Clinton (like 95% of the republicans) simply believes whatever her donors tell her. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl 8 points 8 months ago (1 child) she was always the "lesser of the evils" candidate. For once the dems need to actually give us a good non-corporate fueled, actually, socially aware and empathetic, candidate. Otherwise the party is done and its probably for the best. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] tym@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[+] tym@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent