Should OS makers, like Microsoft, be legally required to provide 15 years of security updates?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 13 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You don't typically pay to run Linux distros. They're open-source. I can't imagine they'd be subject to this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 11 months ago

    Upgrades are more seamless as well, it's definitely a bit more blurry of a process. Plus Ubuntu releases twice a year, so their versions are more like the equivalent of Microsoft's service packs (or whatever they call them now) but on a rolling basis.

  • source
  • parent