you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This is such a garbage take. There is no way to “show our world as it truly is” in two dimensions. I’m all about showing other projects and orientations. Classrooms should have “upside down” maps and Albert maps for example. But we should also teach that each projection has benefits and drawbacks. I was taught that decades ago. Have we stopped?

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    The way the world's going, the next accepted projection will be depicted on the backs of four elephants atop a turtle.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Its the same take that's applied to any party seen as a "status quo". Your boss, the CEO, police, the state, movies, everything is "projected" to show something that it isn't to subtly manipulate the basis of your decisions.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -5 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Africans: You know, 14th century mercator maps are horribly disproportionate over 1/2 the map and are the maps of reference for most online apps, software and textbooks. There are better projections that balance location for actual land mass, we should probably use those.

    lemmy: garbage take.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    There aren’t better maps. Only maps with different tradeoffs. ALL 2d maps of spheres are disproportionate.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    There absolutely are better maps for specific purposes. Or do you think this map would be no better or worse for the purpose of teaching school children?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Oh boy! Are you serious? Let me be more precise, in case. There aren’t actual projections that are better in all cases than the Mercator projection. There are maps that are better in given cases. ALL maps have trade offs. The one you shared, included. It certainly benefits from the humor of pointing out why this is an issue in the first place.

    https://xkcd.com/977/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    in all cases I think the part tripping you up

    We can do better with teaching, news and infographics than a map that is just designed for ship navigation.

    It's like you'd run over a dozen kids in the trolly problem rather than a geriatric because there's no perfect solution.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    No, there aren't perfect maps. There ARE better maps.

    Mercator's one trick is north is always straight up, so it's great for navigation with a compass. If you're navigating the oceans on a ship, or even using GPS in your car, Mercator is GOAT because you don't have to twist it as your drive to keep north up. Unfortunately, we default to Mercator just about everywhere in places where it really has disadvantages.

    If you're just looking at the map to locate things, or compare countries there are dozens of better maps and our decision to default to mercator for most uses us

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] [S] -6 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    99% of people dont know that there other projections. I dare you to ask people which map projection is their favorite.

    Ideally yes we should stick to standard and make sure everyone knows thay there are many variants and none of them perfectly represent the sphere were on but thats not happening.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 year ago

    I don’t believe that 99% figure for a second. Unless geography is removed from all curricula worldwide. Even still, that ignorance would not signify what this movement implies. It is a useful map; end of story. If the movement were, “We should increase public knowledge of geography and how projections work,” fine. But it isn’t.

  • source
  • parent