▲ 500 ▼ YSK There's a campaign to replace the distorted Mercator world map with the fairer Equal-Earth projection (correctthemap.org) submitted 1 year ago by drmoose@lemmy.world to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world 178 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 73 points 1 year ago* (3 children) still not as aesthetic as Waterman butterfly projection (and relevant XKCD) permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 20 points 1 year ago I didn't think I'd ever have a favourite map but here we are. permalink fedilink source parent [–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) That projection shows how vast the Pacific is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* It's almost two entire sections, with just a little of North America, Asia, and Antarctica. And then some on four others. It's obvious from a glance, no other body of water or land mass comes anywhere near that. And if you still don't think that's vast enough, maybe a lifetime of bad projections have given you a distorted view of the Pacific's size. Mercator and Mercator like projections definitely make the Pacific look much too large near the poles. permalink fedilink source parent [–] craigers@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Came here to make sure that xkcd got posted. Well done. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 20 points 1 year ago I didn't think I'd ever have a favourite map but here we are. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BlueEther@no.lastname.nz 11 points 1 year ago (1 child) That projection shows how vast the Pacific is permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* It's almost two entire sections, with just a little of North America, Asia, and Antarctica. And then some on four others. It's obvious from a glance, no other body of water or land mass comes anywhere near that. And if you still don't think that's vast enough, maybe a lifetime of bad projections have given you a distorted view of the Pacific's size. Mercator and Mercator like projections definitely make the Pacific look much too large near the poles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] roscoe@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* It's almost two entire sections, with just a little of North America, Asia, and Antarctica. And then some on four others. It's obvious from a glance, no other body of water or land mass comes anywhere near that. And if you still don't think that's vast enough, maybe a lifetime of bad projections have given you a distorted view of the Pacific's size. Mercator and Mercator like projections definitely make the Pacific look much too large near the poles. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] craigers@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Came here to make sure that xkcd got posted. Well done. permalink fedilink source parent