▲ 1195 ▼ I've honestly never quite realized up until now how utterly ridiculous it is that people (especially in the US) regularly demand that their food be chauffeured to them. (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by destructdisc@lemmy.world to c/fuckcars@lemmy.world 352 comments fedilink hide all child comments Source
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) yes, because the optimal solution is clearly the most extreme counterexample you can imagine permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) An extreme counterexample is required in response to your extreme mischaracterization of the guy's argument. I'm just continuing down your logic of exaggerating the argument to the point of being nonsensical. It turns out you only like it when you do it to other people, but not when its done to you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) my point is that a society optimise for an individual ends up being needlessly wasteful and miserable for an individual. a society were time is so scarse that is in your best interest to have someone barely making a living so you can have overpriced cold meals, because having time to just exist and do groceries and cook is unfeasible. however a more collectivist and less atomised society you would rarely be in such situation in the first place permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're right, but that's wanting something that the guy you're replying to is powerless to change by himself. Simply arguing against using gig economy delivery services without fixing the underlying cause for why they need to use it doesn't solve the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago he can change it, we all can, participate in your community, find local mutual aids... it'll make you feel much better, less powerless, and make their neighbourhood a much better place to be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) An extreme counterexample is required in response to your extreme mischaracterization of the guy's argument. I'm just continuing down your logic of exaggerating the argument to the point of being nonsensical. It turns out you only like it when you do it to other people, but not when its done to you. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) my point is that a society optimise for an individual ends up being needlessly wasteful and miserable for an individual. a society were time is so scarse that is in your best interest to have someone barely making a living so you can have overpriced cold meals, because having time to just exist and do groceries and cook is unfeasible. however a more collectivist and less atomised society you would rarely be in such situation in the first place permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're right, but that's wanting something that the guy you're replying to is powerless to change by himself. Simply arguing against using gig economy delivery services without fixing the underlying cause for why they need to use it doesn't solve the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago he can change it, we all can, participate in your community, find local mutual aids... it'll make you feel much better, less powerless, and make their neighbourhood a much better place to be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) my point is that a society optimise for an individual ends up being needlessly wasteful and miserable for an individual. a society were time is so scarse that is in your best interest to have someone barely making a living so you can have overpriced cold meals, because having time to just exist and do groceries and cook is unfeasible. however a more collectivist and less atomised society you would rarely be in such situation in the first place permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're right, but that's wanting something that the guy you're replying to is powerless to change by himself. Simply arguing against using gig economy delivery services without fixing the underlying cause for why they need to use it doesn't solve the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago he can change it, we all can, participate in your community, find local mutual aids... it'll make you feel much better, less powerless, and make their neighbourhood a much better place to be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) You're right, but that's wanting something that the guy you're replying to is powerless to change by himself. Simply arguing against using gig economy delivery services without fixing the underlying cause for why they need to use it doesn't solve the problem. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago he can change it, we all can, participate in your community, find local mutual aids... it'll make you feel much better, less powerless, and make their neighbourhood a much better place to be. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago he can change it, we all can, participate in your community, find local mutual aids... it'll make you feel much better, less powerless, and make their neighbourhood a much better place to be. permalink fedilink source parent
