you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

So did you hunt for your dinner last night?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    yes, because the optimal solution is clearly the most extreme counterexample you can imagine

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    An extreme counterexample is required in response to your extreme mischaracterization of the guy's argument. I'm just continuing down your logic of exaggerating the argument to the point of being nonsensical. It turns out you only like it when you do it to other people, but not when its done to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    my point is that a society optimise for an individual ends up being needlessly wasteful and miserable for an individual.

    a society were time is so scarse that is in your best interest to have someone barely making a living so you can have overpriced cold meals, because having time to just exist and do groceries and cook is unfeasible.

    however a more collectivist and less atomised society you would rarely be in such situation in the first place

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (1 child)

    You're right, but that's wanting something that the guy you're replying to is powerless to change by himself. Simply arguing against using gig economy delivery services without fixing the underlying cause for why they need to use it doesn't solve the problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments