▲ 141 ▼ Molly - a better signal (molly.im) submitted 2 years ago by possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.ml 128 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] couragethebravedog@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) I had mistaken molly for a different signal fork. Molly just uses an encrypted local db that doesn't rely solely on the OS encryption method. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ok, so besides being mostly FOSS (Molly) or all FOSS (Molly-FOSS), the only difference, is that Molly encrypts your db on top of the laughably easy to decrypt Signal db encryption and OS encryption? Wouldn't that make push notifications impossible, though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago You get notifications but you don't see the sender of the message or the content. At least I haven't found an option to enable that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 8 points 2 years ago (1 child) Ok, so besides being mostly FOSS (Molly) or all FOSS (Molly-FOSS), the only difference, is that Molly encrypts your db on top of the laughably easy to decrypt Signal db encryption and OS encryption? Wouldn't that make push notifications impossible, though? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago You get notifications but you don't see the sender of the message or the content. At least I haven't found an option to enable that. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] netchami@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago You get notifications but you don't see the sender of the message or the content. At least I haven't found an option to enable that. permalink fedilink source parent