โฒ 56 โผ What, if anything, are the Democrats doing to stop Trump and his cronies? (lemmy.ml) submitted 1 year ago by JoMiran@lemmy.ml to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml 46 comments fedilink hide all child comments I blocked a lot of political keywords, so I am genuinely asking because I might be ill informed. What concrete actions have the Democrats taken to block, stop, or reverse Trumps illegal actions? Again, I am genuinely asking.
[โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Dems couldโve jailed officials for contempt How does that work? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) So you're admitting that you have no clue how the US legal system works? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes. Tell me how congress jails officials. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Google exists, spend some time educating yourself if you genuinely care about understanding the subject. If you'd like me to tutor you, then feel free to send a dm and pay me for the effort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Gotcha. So you either you don't know or you do know this is not true. Congress has no power to jail officials. They can hold an official in contempt and potentially have the US Attorney's office put them in jail. That's not happening with Trump. That's not happening with anyone in Trump's administration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The point is they haven't even tried doing this. But you keep on braying here pretending like you have clue. It's adorable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) For what would they hold the administration in contempt and what does this do to block, stop, or reverse illegal actions? It seems like you're lacking a basic understanding of how law and government work and it doesn't seem like you know what contempt means. And, to make up for that, you throw out witless insults in an attempt to derail the conversation. You, "the internet", are far too emotional to consider the reality of these situations. Just because something makes you angry or someone does something you think should be illegal does not mean someone is not permitted to do that action. There are absolutely actions that Trump has done that are illegal and many of those actions have been decided on while other cases are in court now. "The Democrats", I presume we're addressing Congress, are not explicitly the group responsible for holding the administration accountable for everything he does. Congress only has authority over a handful of things (mostly, but not limited to, money) with few options to do anything about them. The point I am trying to make is; (1) what actions does OP suggest are illegal, (2) a court has to determined that action to be illegal, (3) Congress is not responsible for suing the president nor responsible for determining what is legal nor responsibly for jailing an executive officer, (4) this Republican Congress is not going to pass legislation (the main power they have) to block, stop, or reverse actions taken by this administration. And, finally, what the Trump administration is doing, legal or not, is largely what the United States voters voted for. So, the best way to stop these quote unquote illegal actions is to vote for Democrats in two years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago I literally explained all this to you in detail already. You're like a chat bot spewing nonsense that is grammatically correct, but lacks any actual meaning upon closer examination. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) So you're admitting that you have no clue how the US legal system works? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes. Tell me how congress jails officials. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Google exists, spend some time educating yourself if you genuinely care about understanding the subject. If you'd like me to tutor you, then feel free to send a dm and pay me for the effort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Gotcha. So you either you don't know or you do know this is not true. Congress has no power to jail officials. They can hold an official in contempt and potentially have the US Attorney's office put them in jail. That's not happening with Trump. That's not happening with anyone in Trump's administration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The point is they haven't even tried doing this. But you keep on braying here pretending like you have clue. It's adorable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) For what would they hold the administration in contempt and what does this do to block, stop, or reverse illegal actions? It seems like you're lacking a basic understanding of how law and government work and it doesn't seem like you know what contempt means. And, to make up for that, you throw out witless insults in an attempt to derail the conversation. You, "the internet", are far too emotional to consider the reality of these situations. Just because something makes you angry or someone does something you think should be illegal does not mean someone is not permitted to do that action. There are absolutely actions that Trump has done that are illegal and many of those actions have been decided on while other cases are in court now. "The Democrats", I presume we're addressing Congress, are not explicitly the group responsible for holding the administration accountable for everything he does. Congress only has authority over a handful of things (mostly, but not limited to, money) with few options to do anything about them. The point I am trying to make is; (1) what actions does OP suggest are illegal, (2) a court has to determined that action to be illegal, (3) Congress is not responsible for suing the president nor responsible for determining what is legal nor responsibly for jailing an executive officer, (4) this Republican Congress is not going to pass legislation (the main power they have) to block, stop, or reverse actions taken by this administration. And, finally, what the Trump administration is doing, legal or not, is largely what the United States voters voted for. So, the best way to stop these quote unquote illegal actions is to vote for Democrats in two years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago I literally explained all this to you in detail already. You're like a chat bot spewing nonsense that is grammatically correct, but lacks any actual meaning upon closer examination. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes. Tell me how congress jails officials. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Google exists, spend some time educating yourself if you genuinely care about understanding the subject. If you'd like me to tutor you, then feel free to send a dm and pay me for the effort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Gotcha. So you either you don't know or you do know this is not true. Congress has no power to jail officials. They can hold an official in contempt and potentially have the US Attorney's office put them in jail. That's not happening with Trump. That's not happening with anyone in Trump's administration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The point is they haven't even tried doing this. But you keep on braying here pretending like you have clue. It's adorable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) For what would they hold the administration in contempt and what does this do to block, stop, or reverse illegal actions? It seems like you're lacking a basic understanding of how law and government work and it doesn't seem like you know what contempt means. And, to make up for that, you throw out witless insults in an attempt to derail the conversation. You, "the internet", are far too emotional to consider the reality of these situations. Just because something makes you angry or someone does something you think should be illegal does not mean someone is not permitted to do that action. There are absolutely actions that Trump has done that are illegal and many of those actions have been decided on while other cases are in court now. "The Democrats", I presume we're addressing Congress, are not explicitly the group responsible for holding the administration accountable for everything he does. Congress only has authority over a handful of things (mostly, but not limited to, money) with few options to do anything about them. The point I am trying to make is; (1) what actions does OP suggest are illegal, (2) a court has to determined that action to be illegal, (3) Congress is not responsible for suing the president nor responsible for determining what is legal nor responsibly for jailing an executive officer, (4) this Republican Congress is not going to pass legislation (the main power they have) to block, stop, or reverse actions taken by this administration. And, finally, what the Trump administration is doing, legal or not, is largely what the United States voters voted for. So, the best way to stop these quote unquote illegal actions is to vote for Democrats in two years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago I literally explained all this to you in detail already. You're like a chat bot spewing nonsense that is grammatically correct, but lacks any actual meaning upon closer examination. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (1 child) Google exists, spend some time educating yourself if you genuinely care about understanding the subject. If you'd like me to tutor you, then feel free to send a dm and pay me for the effort. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Gotcha. So you either you don't know or you do know this is not true. Congress has no power to jail officials. They can hold an official in contempt and potentially have the US Attorney's office put them in jail. That's not happening with Trump. That's not happening with anyone in Trump's administration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The point is they haven't even tried doing this. But you keep on braying here pretending like you have clue. It's adorable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) For what would they hold the administration in contempt and what does this do to block, stop, or reverse illegal actions? It seems like you're lacking a basic understanding of how law and government work and it doesn't seem like you know what contempt means. And, to make up for that, you throw out witless insults in an attempt to derail the conversation. You, "the internet", are far too emotional to consider the reality of these situations. Just because something makes you angry or someone does something you think should be illegal does not mean someone is not permitted to do that action. There are absolutely actions that Trump has done that are illegal and many of those actions have been decided on while other cases are in court now. "The Democrats", I presume we're addressing Congress, are not explicitly the group responsible for holding the administration accountable for everything he does. Congress only has authority over a handful of things (mostly, but not limited to, money) with few options to do anything about them. The point I am trying to make is; (1) what actions does OP suggest are illegal, (2) a court has to determined that action to be illegal, (3) Congress is not responsible for suing the president nor responsible for determining what is legal nor responsibly for jailing an executive officer, (4) this Republican Congress is not going to pass legislation (the main power they have) to block, stop, or reverse actions taken by this administration. And, finally, what the Trump administration is doing, legal or not, is largely what the United States voters voted for. So, the best way to stop these quote unquote illegal actions is to vote for Democrats in two years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago I literally explained all this to you in detail already. You're like a chat bot spewing nonsense that is grammatically correct, but lacks any actual meaning upon closer examination. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Gotcha. So you either you don't know or you do know this is not true. Congress has no power to jail officials. They can hold an official in contempt and potentially have the US Attorney's office put them in jail. That's not happening with Trump. That's not happening with anyone in Trump's administration. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The point is they haven't even tried doing this. But you keep on braying here pretending like you have clue. It's adorable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) For what would they hold the administration in contempt and what does this do to block, stop, or reverse illegal actions? It seems like you're lacking a basic understanding of how law and government work and it doesn't seem like you know what contempt means. And, to make up for that, you throw out witless insults in an attempt to derail the conversation. You, "the internet", are far too emotional to consider the reality of these situations. Just because something makes you angry or someone does something you think should be illegal does not mean someone is not permitted to do that action. There are absolutely actions that Trump has done that are illegal and many of those actions have been decided on while other cases are in court now. "The Democrats", I presume we're addressing Congress, are not explicitly the group responsible for holding the administration accountable for everything he does. Congress only has authority over a handful of things (mostly, but not limited to, money) with few options to do anything about them. The point I am trying to make is; (1) what actions does OP suggest are illegal, (2) a court has to determined that action to be illegal, (3) Congress is not responsible for suing the president nor responsible for determining what is legal nor responsibly for jailing an executive officer, (4) this Republican Congress is not going to pass legislation (the main power they have) to block, stop, or reverse actions taken by this administration. And, finally, what the Trump administration is doing, legal or not, is largely what the United States voters voted for. So, the best way to stop these quote unquote illegal actions is to vote for Democrats in two years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago I literally explained all this to you in detail already. You're like a chat bot spewing nonsense that is grammatically correct, but lacks any actual meaning upon closer examination. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) The point is they haven't even tried doing this. But you keep on braying here pretending like you have clue. It's adorable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) For what would they hold the administration in contempt and what does this do to block, stop, or reverse illegal actions? It seems like you're lacking a basic understanding of how law and government work and it doesn't seem like you know what contempt means. And, to make up for that, you throw out witless insults in an attempt to derail the conversation. You, "the internet", are far too emotional to consider the reality of these situations. Just because something makes you angry or someone does something you think should be illegal does not mean someone is not permitted to do that action. There are absolutely actions that Trump has done that are illegal and many of those actions have been decided on while other cases are in court now. "The Democrats", I presume we're addressing Congress, are not explicitly the group responsible for holding the administration accountable for everything he does. Congress only has authority over a handful of things (mostly, but not limited to, money) with few options to do anything about them. The point I am trying to make is; (1) what actions does OP suggest are illegal, (2) a court has to determined that action to be illegal, (3) Congress is not responsible for suing the president nor responsible for determining what is legal nor responsibly for jailing an executive officer, (4) this Republican Congress is not going to pass legislation (the main power they have) to block, stop, or reverse actions taken by this administration. And, finally, what the Trump administration is doing, legal or not, is largely what the United States voters voted for. So, the best way to stop these quote unquote illegal actions is to vote for Democrats in two years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago I literally explained all this to you in detail already. You're like a chat bot spewing nonsense that is grammatically correct, but lacks any actual meaning upon closer examination. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] oxjox@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 child) For what would they hold the administration in contempt and what does this do to block, stop, or reverse illegal actions? It seems like you're lacking a basic understanding of how law and government work and it doesn't seem like you know what contempt means. And, to make up for that, you throw out witless insults in an attempt to derail the conversation. You, "the internet", are far too emotional to consider the reality of these situations. Just because something makes you angry or someone does something you think should be illegal does not mean someone is not permitted to do that action. There are absolutely actions that Trump has done that are illegal and many of those actions have been decided on while other cases are in court now. "The Democrats", I presume we're addressing Congress, are not explicitly the group responsible for holding the administration accountable for everything he does. Congress only has authority over a handful of things (mostly, but not limited to, money) with few options to do anything about them. The point I am trying to make is; (1) what actions does OP suggest are illegal, (2) a court has to determined that action to be illegal, (3) Congress is not responsible for suing the president nor responsible for determining what is legal nor responsibly for jailing an executive officer, (4) this Republican Congress is not going to pass legislation (the main power they have) to block, stop, or reverse actions taken by this administration. And, finally, what the Trump administration is doing, legal or not, is largely what the United States voters voted for. So, the best way to stop these quote unquote illegal actions is to vote for Democrats in two years. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago I literally explained all this to you in detail already. You're like a chat bot spewing nonsense that is grammatically correct, but lacks any actual meaning upon closer examination. permalink fedilink source parent
[โ] yogthos@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago I literally explained all this to you in detail already. You're like a chat bot spewing nonsense that is grammatically correct, but lacks any actual meaning upon closer examination. permalink fedilink source parent