▲ 619 ▼ Comment threads, on the default lemmy-ui. (lemm.ee) submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Irelephant@lemm.ee to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk 345 comments fedilink hide all child comments Apologies to the mods.
[+] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I rest my case: you just consider anyone disagreeing with you in any way to be unacceptable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Sure. Sounds like projection on your part. Ad hominem Again, no. You can’t address what he said, so you’re making up your own strawman. Ad hominem What, specifically, are you accusing him of doing wrong? Sounds like you just don’t like him disagreeing with you. Ad hominem OP has explicitly said otherwise, but you’ve already established you feel entitled to tell people their own opinions. Yes, because OP gave him the benefit of doubt because OP thought he's not a bad actor. But not that it matter because the second part of your one-liner goes back to Ad hominem. Any actual examples though? Besides the one I mentioned? Well there's also the one where he's pushed about being critical of Russia's actions he deflects to America being worse. Uhuh. Still seems like you’re the one arguing in bad faith. Ad hominem You have indeed demonstrated that your were arguing in bad faith from the start and that you’re just salty someone disagreed with you. Ad hominem conclusion. Where is the substance? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ad hominem Incorrect, it is not an ad hominem. Ad hominem Again, no it isn't. Ad hominem Do you even know what an ad hominem is? Yes, because OP gave him the benefit of doubt because OP thought he’s not a bad actor. Are you saying that OP has changed their mind? But not that it matter because the second part of your one-liner goes back to Ad hominem. Still not what an ad hominem is. Or a one liner for that matter... Besides the one I mentioned? No, an actual example Well there’s also the one where he’s pushed about being critical of Russia’s actions he deflects to America being worse. That's not an example though. That's literally just him stating his opinion. Ad hominem Can you actually learn what "ad hominem" means and come and try again? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* Okay. I looked up the definition of ad hominem and I came to a conclusion, it's still ad hominem. Maybe you should learn what is it and then come back when you've actually got something to say. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) I rest my case: you just consider anyone disagreeing with you in any way to be unacceptable. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Sure. Sounds like projection on your part. Ad hominem Again, no. You can’t address what he said, so you’re making up your own strawman. Ad hominem What, specifically, are you accusing him of doing wrong? Sounds like you just don’t like him disagreeing with you. Ad hominem OP has explicitly said otherwise, but you’ve already established you feel entitled to tell people their own opinions. Yes, because OP gave him the benefit of doubt because OP thought he's not a bad actor. But not that it matter because the second part of your one-liner goes back to Ad hominem. Any actual examples though? Besides the one I mentioned? Well there's also the one where he's pushed about being critical of Russia's actions he deflects to America being worse. Uhuh. Still seems like you’re the one arguing in bad faith. Ad hominem You have indeed demonstrated that your were arguing in bad faith from the start and that you’re just salty someone disagreed with you. Ad hominem conclusion. Where is the substance? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ad hominem Incorrect, it is not an ad hominem. Ad hominem Again, no it isn't. Ad hominem Do you even know what an ad hominem is? Yes, because OP gave him the benefit of doubt because OP thought he’s not a bad actor. Are you saying that OP has changed their mind? But not that it matter because the second part of your one-liner goes back to Ad hominem. Still not what an ad hominem is. Or a one liner for that matter... Besides the one I mentioned? No, an actual example Well there’s also the one where he’s pushed about being critical of Russia’s actions he deflects to America being worse. That's not an example though. That's literally just him stating his opinion. Ad hominem Can you actually learn what "ad hominem" means and come and try again? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* Okay. I looked up the definition of ad hominem and I came to a conclusion, it's still ad hominem. Maybe you should learn what is it and then come back when you've actually got something to say. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 1 point 1 year ago (1 child) Sure. Sounds like projection on your part. Ad hominem Again, no. You can’t address what he said, so you’re making up your own strawman. Ad hominem What, specifically, are you accusing him of doing wrong? Sounds like you just don’t like him disagreeing with you. Ad hominem OP has explicitly said otherwise, but you’ve already established you feel entitled to tell people their own opinions. Yes, because OP gave him the benefit of doubt because OP thought he's not a bad actor. But not that it matter because the second part of your one-liner goes back to Ad hominem. Any actual examples though? Besides the one I mentioned? Well there's also the one where he's pushed about being critical of Russia's actions he deflects to America being worse. Uhuh. Still seems like you’re the one arguing in bad faith. Ad hominem You have indeed demonstrated that your were arguing in bad faith from the start and that you’re just salty someone disagreed with you. Ad hominem conclusion. Where is the substance? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ad hominem Incorrect, it is not an ad hominem. Ad hominem Again, no it isn't. Ad hominem Do you even know what an ad hominem is? Yes, because OP gave him the benefit of doubt because OP thought he’s not a bad actor. Are you saying that OP has changed their mind? But not that it matter because the second part of your one-liner goes back to Ad hominem. Still not what an ad hominem is. Or a one liner for that matter... Besides the one I mentioned? No, an actual example Well there’s also the one where he’s pushed about being critical of Russia’s actions he deflects to America being worse. That's not an example though. That's literally just him stating his opinion. Ad hominem Can you actually learn what "ad hominem" means and come and try again? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* Okay. I looked up the definition of ad hominem and I came to a conclusion, it's still ad hominem. Maybe you should learn what is it and then come back when you've actually got something to say. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ad hominem Incorrect, it is not an ad hominem. Ad hominem Again, no it isn't. Ad hominem Do you even know what an ad hominem is? Yes, because OP gave him the benefit of doubt because OP thought he’s not a bad actor. Are you saying that OP has changed their mind? But not that it matter because the second part of your one-liner goes back to Ad hominem. Still not what an ad hominem is. Or a one liner for that matter... Besides the one I mentioned? No, an actual example Well there’s also the one where he’s pushed about being critical of Russia’s actions he deflects to America being worse. That's not an example though. That's literally just him stating his opinion. Ad hominem Can you actually learn what "ad hominem" means and come and try again? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* Okay. I looked up the definition of ad hominem and I came to a conclusion, it's still ad hominem. Maybe you should learn what is it and then come back when you've actually got something to say. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* Okay. I looked up the definition of ad hominem and I came to a conclusion, it's still ad hominem. Maybe you should learn what is it and then come back when you've actually got something to say. permalink fedilink source parent