▲ 340 ▼ Just a quick thanks to all the Instance admins out there as we await yet another Reddit wave 💪 (lemmy.world) submitted 1 year ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/fedimemes@feddit.uk 237 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children) [removed by mod] permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago They're 100% BlueMAGA in my opinion. permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Hate to break it to ya, but most people on Reddit are in fact anti-tankie Also please show me my last post on this because it has been a while lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Carl@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago I think "most" people just believe uncritically the things they were taught growing up, that is until something happens that shakes that belief and they either choose to double down or reexamine their previous assumptions. All the new western tankies from the past decade-ish aren't coming from nowhere! permalink fedilink source parent [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) Anti-tankies aren’t getting banned because they’re not supporting leftists and Luigi, genius. They’re allowed to stay on Reddit and post NATO propaganda to their heart’s content. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Tankie!= Leftists, Tankies = authoritarians For example, I myself 1000% support Luigi and shit on my gov all the time lmao But I am absolutely anti-tankie, because I do not support authoritarianism regardless of if it's the US or China/Russia permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yes, you’ve attempted to play yourself off as leftist-adjacent to push these topics before. We’ve gotten into back and forths on this multiple times, and every time you’re provided a source that the western talking points you’re pushing are debunked, you repeat the State Dept propaganda verbatim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think he supports every socialist revolution, except for every one that succeeds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Edie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago Here is a slightly better website with the chapter permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ah yes, your "sources" that are always random websites, blogs and YT videos with 0 legitimacy. And when you do post a primary source it contradicts your point. Or the time you posted a state department source to support your point and not only did it not, it proved that you only deride against sources as "propaganda" when they're against you, but when you think they're for you it's all hunky dory? Lol So, it's either support authoritarianism or your not left? What kinda crap is that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) OP’s referring to when I provided a link from the State Dept admitting they had no evidence of a Uyghur genocide. They also don’t accept non-western sources as legitimate, so demand that you provide a western source to disprove western propaganda. Thanks for putting on a show for the flood of new users. Way to immediately out yourself to incoming leftists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol the state dept link that said they didn't have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, they tried to double down in the middle of admitting they’ve been engaged in a years long hoax. Which is what all of the western sources will do, and again you do not consider non-western sources legitimate. An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] AlDente@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago They're 100% BlueMAGA in my opinion. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -3 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Hate to break it to ya, but most people on Reddit are in fact anti-tankie Also please show me my last post on this because it has been a while lmao permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Carl@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago I think "most" people just believe uncritically the things they were taught growing up, that is until something happens that shakes that belief and they either choose to double down or reexamine their previous assumptions. All the new western tankies from the past decade-ish aren't coming from nowhere! permalink fedilink source parent [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) Anti-tankies aren’t getting banned because they’re not supporting leftists and Luigi, genius. They’re allowed to stay on Reddit and post NATO propaganda to their heart’s content. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Tankie!= Leftists, Tankies = authoritarians For example, I myself 1000% support Luigi and shit on my gov all the time lmao But I am absolutely anti-tankie, because I do not support authoritarianism regardless of if it's the US or China/Russia permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yes, you’ve attempted to play yourself off as leftist-adjacent to push these topics before. We’ve gotten into back and forths on this multiple times, and every time you’re provided a source that the western talking points you’re pushing are debunked, you repeat the State Dept propaganda verbatim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think he supports every socialist revolution, except for every one that succeeds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Edie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago Here is a slightly better website with the chapter permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ah yes, your "sources" that are always random websites, blogs and YT videos with 0 legitimacy. And when you do post a primary source it contradicts your point. Or the time you posted a state department source to support your point and not only did it not, it proved that you only deride against sources as "propaganda" when they're against you, but when you think they're for you it's all hunky dory? Lol So, it's either support authoritarianism or your not left? What kinda crap is that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) OP’s referring to when I provided a link from the State Dept admitting they had no evidence of a Uyghur genocide. They also don’t accept non-western sources as legitimate, so demand that you provide a western source to disprove western propaganda. Thanks for putting on a show for the flood of new users. Way to immediately out yourself to incoming leftists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol the state dept link that said they didn't have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, they tried to double down in the middle of admitting they’ve been engaged in a years long hoax. Which is what all of the western sources will do, and again you do not consider non-western sources legitimate. An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Carl@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago I think "most" people just believe uncritically the things they were taught growing up, that is until something happens that shakes that belief and they either choose to double down or reexamine their previous assumptions. All the new western tankies from the past decade-ish aren't coming from nowhere! permalink fedilink source parent
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child) Anti-tankies aren’t getting banned because they’re not supporting leftists and Luigi, genius. They’re allowed to stay on Reddit and post NATO propaganda to their heart’s content. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [+] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Tankie!= Leftists, Tankies = authoritarians For example, I myself 1000% support Luigi and shit on my gov all the time lmao But I am absolutely anti-tankie, because I do not support authoritarianism regardless of if it's the US or China/Russia permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yes, you’ve attempted to play yourself off as leftist-adjacent to push these topics before. We’ve gotten into back and forths on this multiple times, and every time you’re provided a source that the western talking points you’re pushing are debunked, you repeat the State Dept propaganda verbatim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think he supports every socialist revolution, except for every one that succeeds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Edie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago Here is a slightly better website with the chapter permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ah yes, your "sources" that are always random websites, blogs and YT videos with 0 legitimacy. And when you do post a primary source it contradicts your point. Or the time you posted a state department source to support your point and not only did it not, it proved that you only deride against sources as "propaganda" when they're against you, but when you think they're for you it's all hunky dory? Lol So, it's either support authoritarianism or your not left? What kinda crap is that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) OP’s referring to when I provided a link from the State Dept admitting they had no evidence of a Uyghur genocide. They also don’t accept non-western sources as legitimate, so demand that you provide a western source to disprove western propaganda. Thanks for putting on a show for the flood of new users. Way to immediately out yourself to incoming leftists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol the state dept link that said they didn't have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, they tried to double down in the middle of admitting they’ve been engaged in a years long hoax. Which is what all of the western sources will do, and again you do not consider non-western sources legitimate. An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent
[+] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -6 points 1 year ago (1 child) Tankie!= Leftists, Tankies = authoritarians For example, I myself 1000% support Luigi and shit on my gov all the time lmao But I am absolutely anti-tankie, because I do not support authoritarianism regardless of if it's the US or China/Russia permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yes, you’ve attempted to play yourself off as leftist-adjacent to push these topics before. We’ve gotten into back and forths on this multiple times, and every time you’re provided a source that the western talking points you’re pushing are debunked, you repeat the State Dept propaganda verbatim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think he supports every socialist revolution, except for every one that succeeds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Edie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago Here is a slightly better website with the chapter permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ah yes, your "sources" that are always random websites, blogs and YT videos with 0 legitimacy. And when you do post a primary source it contradicts your point. Or the time you posted a state department source to support your point and not only did it not, it proved that you only deride against sources as "propaganda" when they're against you, but when you think they're for you it's all hunky dory? Lol So, it's either support authoritarianism or your not left? What kinda crap is that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) OP’s referring to when I provided a link from the State Dept admitting they had no evidence of a Uyghur genocide. They also don’t accept non-western sources as legitimate, so demand that you provide a western source to disprove western propaganda. Thanks for putting on a show for the flood of new users. Way to immediately out yourself to incoming leftists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol the state dept link that said they didn't have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, they tried to double down in the middle of admitting they’ve been engaged in a years long hoax. Which is what all of the western sources will do, and again you do not consider non-western sources legitimate. An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (2 children) Yes, you’ve attempted to play yourself off as leftist-adjacent to push these topics before. We’ve gotten into back and forths on this multiple times, and every time you’re provided a source that the western talking points you’re pushing are debunked, you repeat the State Dept propaganda verbatim. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think he supports every socialist revolution, except for every one that succeeds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Edie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago Here is a slightly better website with the chapter permalink fedilink source parent [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ah yes, your "sources" that are always random websites, blogs and YT videos with 0 legitimacy. And when you do post a primary source it contradicts your point. Or the time you posted a state department source to support your point and not only did it not, it proved that you only deride against sources as "propaganda" when they're against you, but when you think they're for you it's all hunky dory? Lol So, it's either support authoritarianism or your not left? What kinda crap is that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) OP’s referring to when I provided a link from the State Dept admitting they had no evidence of a Uyghur genocide. They also don’t accept non-western sources as legitimate, so demand that you provide a western source to disprove western propaganda. Thanks for putting on a show for the flood of new users. Way to immediately out yourself to incoming leftists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol the state dept link that said they didn't have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, they tried to double down in the middle of admitting they’ve been engaged in a years long hoax. Which is what all of the western sources will do, and again you do not consider non-western sources legitimate. An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kuato@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 child) I think he supports every socialist revolution, except for every one that succeeds. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Edie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago Here is a slightly better website with the chapter permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Edie@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago Here is a slightly better website with the chapter permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -4 points 1 year ago (1 child) Ah yes, your "sources" that are always random websites, blogs and YT videos with 0 legitimacy. And when you do post a primary source it contradicts your point. Or the time you posted a state department source to support your point and not only did it not, it proved that you only deride against sources as "propaganda" when they're against you, but when you think they're for you it's all hunky dory? Lol So, it's either support authoritarianism or your not left? What kinda crap is that? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) OP’s referring to when I provided a link from the State Dept admitting they had no evidence of a Uyghur genocide. They also don’t accept non-western sources as legitimate, so demand that you provide a western source to disprove western propaganda. Thanks for putting on a show for the flood of new users. Way to immediately out yourself to incoming leftists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol the state dept link that said they didn't have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, they tried to double down in the middle of admitting they’ve been engaged in a years long hoax. Which is what all of the western sources will do, and again you do not consider non-western sources legitimate. An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) OP’s referring to when I provided a link from the State Dept admitting they had no evidence of a Uyghur genocide. They also don’t accept non-western sources as legitimate, so demand that you provide a western source to disprove western propaganda. Thanks for putting on a show for the flood of new users. Way to immediately out yourself to incoming leftists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol the state dept link that said they didn't have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, they tried to double down in the middle of admitting they’ve been engaged in a years long hoax. Which is what all of the western sources will do, and again you do not consider non-western sources legitimate. An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] cm0002@lemmy.world [S] -2 points 1 year ago (1 child) Lol the state dept link that said they didn't have evidence to meet the strictest definition of genocide, but had evidence of gross serious human rights violations of China permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, they tried to double down in the middle of admitting they’ve been engaged in a years long hoax. Which is what all of the western sources will do, and again you do not consider non-western sources legitimate. An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 child) Yes, they tried to double down in the middle of admitting they’ve been engaged in a years long hoax. Which is what all of the western sources will do, and again you do not consider non-western sources legitimate. An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kuato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 child) An intentional self re-enforcing propaganda loop. What we are dealing with is a nonfalsifiable orthodoxy permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] surph_ninja@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago Beautifully said. permalink fedilink source parent