you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

There are tons of reasons my dude. You can still have platform-dependant technologies in your game even if the base engine itself supports linux.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    The kernel in use is literally meaningless. Sony’s userspace is unique and the graphics stack is fully proprietary. Same for Nintendo.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    I find that to be an annoying thing with Japanese software in general, gaming or otherwise: more proprietary garbage than Western software and practically hard-coding it to 100% force you to use the software in the way THEY intend for you to use it, not how YOU want. Makes for worse Linux compatibility at best, if any at all, compared to Western software. Note that I'm purely talking about native or straight Wine Linux compatibility, not Steam/Proton, which works around those issues well.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    In an ideal world everything would work out, but for some business it is a pretty huge commitment for what was less than 2% of the market just a few months ago. We certainly lost money porting our game in Linux at that last place I worked. It was before Proton though. Obviously each case is different, and some games work on Linux out-the-box due to Photon so this become a non-issue.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Not sure I want to name the game because this would make me very easy to identify from my post history. It's a game on Steam that sold over 250k copies. My boss promised a Linux version very early on because they thought it would be easy, but we ended up being stuck with that promise.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    From my own experience, "not bothering" is definitely the better business practice since chances are you won't make back the development costs.

    Maybe Steam Deck and that porting library have improved things but a decade ago it would have been better business to just give Linux users $20 to not play your game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments