β² 1436 βΌ Bad Influence. (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world 103 comments fedilink hide all child comments Art by Alex Krokus https://bsky.app/profile/alexkrokus.bsky.social
[β] __nobodynowhere@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago* (4 children) Honestly don't do anything you wouldn't want a fascism regime knowing about on any PC running Windows or MacOS or any smart phone. On that note, what Linux distro are best for privacy? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 8 child comments replies: [β] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago At this point, any of them. Strictly speaking, fully loaded Kali Linux (or an equivalent build) so you can learn to do subversive things against adversarial networks. But really, if you just want an operating system under your control, every version of Linux will do that for you. But Hannah Montana Linux will do it for you with the most style. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Admittedly I'm not keeping up on this, so maybe outdated but it used to be Tails. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Kali took Tails' place a few years back, I think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Kali was more for pen testing, hacking. Tails was a live disc that defaulted to tor and other privacy focused use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago True. permalink fedilink source parent [β] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago Depends on your opsec scope and use case. It also depends on the software you are running ontop like your browser or other services that probably have even more data on you. permalink fedilink source parent [β] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) On that note, what Linux distro are best for privacy? Funnily enough, GrapheneOS Android. All popular general purpose Linux Desktop distros suck in terms of privacy and security out of the box. It is possible to configure stuff like SELinux but that is very far above what even a competent Linux user is able to do properly. Tails and QubesOS are amazing in terms of security and privacy, but their lack of general usability means very few people are going to use them day to day. For most users, they are impractical. GrapheneOS has a mix of security, privacy and usability that makes it attractive choice for anyone somewhat competent with technology and caring for privacy. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] MajorHavoc@programming.dev 4 points 2 years ago At this point, any of them. Strictly speaking, fully loaded Kali Linux (or an equivalent build) so you can learn to do subversive things against adversarial networks. But really, if you just want an operating system under your control, every version of Linux will do that for you. But Hannah Montana Linux will do it for you with the most style. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago (1 child) Admittedly I'm not keeping up on this, so maybe outdated but it used to be Tails. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Kali took Tails' place a few years back, I think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Kali was more for pen testing, hacking. Tails was a live disc that defaulted to tor and other privacy focused use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago True. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 child) Kali took Tails' place a few years back, I think. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Kali was more for pen testing, hacking. Tails was a live disc that defaulted to tor and other privacy focused use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago True. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Itsamelemmy@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 years ago (1 child) Kali was more for pen testing, hacking. Tails was a live disc that defaulted to tor and other privacy focused use. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] ZeffSyde@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago True. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Overshoot2648@lemm.ee 4 points 2 years ago Depends on your opsec scope and use case. It also depends on the software you are running ontop like your browser or other services that probably have even more data on you. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) On that note, what Linux distro are best for privacy? Funnily enough, GrapheneOS Android. All popular general purpose Linux Desktop distros suck in terms of privacy and security out of the box. It is possible to configure stuff like SELinux but that is very far above what even a competent Linux user is able to do properly. Tails and QubesOS are amazing in terms of security and privacy, but their lack of general usability means very few people are going to use them day to day. For most users, they are impractical. GrapheneOS has a mix of security, privacy and usability that makes it attractive choice for anyone somewhat competent with technology and caring for privacy. permalink fedilink source parent