β² 710 βΌ We are not the same (lemmy.world) submitted 2 years ago by byrtzr@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world 159 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[β] herrvogel@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (3 children) Running yay every other day is all the maintenance I do on my arch installation. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [β] Nalivai@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. My wife is a teacher and she runs Arch daily, knowing only how to run yay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago β€οΈwhish more people would understand that a good set up Arch does not need maintenance, just updates prior you turn your pc off. You could even automate that, like OpenSource TW is by default. permalink fedilink source parent [β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) When I tried Arch in '23, it worked well. Then I got busy and lazy and didn't use it for 2-3 months. When I came back and did yay -sYu as I had learned, dozens of KDE and core packages were throwing errors and wouldn't update. Unfortunate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] bitwaba@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago yay -Syu, and around that time KDE had switched from plasma 5 to plasma 6, which involved moving a lot of packages into the extra repository, so you had to sit there and confirm each package move (unless you used --noconfirm). permalink fedilink source parent [β] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You gotta read what yay is telling you.. π«£error come with a text for a reason! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I did. It told me I needed to uninstall them. π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) π I see, I guess it was assumed that the user gets, that they have to install it again afterwards (the correct version) if they still need the software π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* No kidding. Why else would it be the result of an attempted update. But thanks for the continued condescension. Can we perhaps stop pretending that it's the most normal thing on earth to run an update and get back "hm yeah so there's an issue, to fix it you're gonna have to uninstall your entire GUI and half of your core operating system", and it's simply user error to be irritated by that in any way. permalink fedilink source parent [β] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago I do it whenever I feel like. Don't even feel the need to be regular. With Win10, the notifications used to increase my tension permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Nalivai@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago (1 child) Exactly. My wife is a teacher and she runs Arch daily, knowing only how to run yay. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago β€οΈwhish more people would understand that a good set up Arch does not need maintenance, just updates prior you turn your pc off. You could even automate that, like OpenSource TW is by default. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Petter1@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago β€οΈwhish more people would understand that a good set up Arch does not need maintenance, just updates prior you turn your pc off. You could even automate that, like OpenSource TW is by default. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago (2 children) When I tried Arch in '23, it worked well. Then I got busy and lazy and didn't use it for 2-3 months. When I came back and did yay -sYu as I had learned, dozens of KDE and core packages were throwing errors and wouldn't update. Unfortunate. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [β] bitwaba@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago yay -Syu, and around that time KDE had switched from plasma 5 to plasma 6, which involved moving a lot of packages into the extra repository, so you had to sit there and confirm each package move (unless you used --noconfirm). permalink fedilink source parent [β] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You gotta read what yay is telling you.. π«£error come with a text for a reason! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I did. It told me I needed to uninstall them. π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) π I see, I guess it was assumed that the user gets, that they have to install it again afterwards (the correct version) if they still need the software π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* No kidding. Why else would it be the result of an attempted update. But thanks for the continued condescension. Can we perhaps stop pretending that it's the most normal thing on earth to run an update and get back "hm yeah so there's an issue, to fix it you're gonna have to uninstall your entire GUI and half of your core operating system", and it's simply user error to be irritated by that in any way. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] bitwaba@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago yay -Syu, and around that time KDE had switched from plasma 5 to plasma 6, which involved moving a lot of packages into the extra repository, so you had to sit there and confirm each package move (unless you used --noconfirm). permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) You gotta read what yay is telling you.. π«£error come with a text for a reason! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I did. It told me I needed to uninstall them. π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) π I see, I guess it was assumed that the user gets, that they have to install it again afterwards (the correct version) if they still need the software π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* No kidding. Why else would it be the result of an attempted update. But thanks for the continued condescension. Can we perhaps stop pretending that it's the most normal thing on earth to run an update and get back "hm yeah so there's an issue, to fix it you're gonna have to uninstall your entire GUI and half of your core operating system", and it's simply user error to be irritated by that in any way. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) I did. It told me I needed to uninstall them. π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) π I see, I guess it was assumed that the user gets, that they have to install it again afterwards (the correct version) if they still need the software π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* No kidding. Why else would it be the result of an attempted update. But thanks for the continued condescension. Can we perhaps stop pretending that it's the most normal thing on earth to run an update and get back "hm yeah so there's an issue, to fix it you're gonna have to uninstall your entire GUI and half of your core operating system", and it's simply user error to be irritated by that in any way. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 point 2 years ago (1 child) π I see, I guess it was assumed that the user gets, that they have to install it again afterwards (the correct version) if they still need the software π€ permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* No kidding. Why else would it be the result of an attempted update. But thanks for the continued condescension. Can we perhaps stop pretending that it's the most normal thing on earth to run an update and get back "hm yeah so there's an issue, to fix it you're gonna have to uninstall your entire GUI and half of your core operating system", and it's simply user error to be irritated by that in any way. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] zqps@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 years ago* No kidding. Why else would it be the result of an attempted update. But thanks for the continued condescension. Can we perhaps stop pretending that it's the most normal thing on earth to run an update and get back "hm yeah so there's an issue, to fix it you're gonna have to uninstall your entire GUI and half of your core operating system", and it's simply user error to be irritated by that in any way. permalink fedilink source parent
[β] ulterno@programming.dev 0 points 2 years ago I do it whenever I feel like. Don't even feel the need to be regular. With Win10, the notifications used to increase my tension permalink fedilink source parent
