[–] 52 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Tunick asked four times during the interrogation to speak with a lawyer, but was rebuffed each time, according to courtroom testimony. Additionally, the agents produced no warrant and did not read Tunick his rights.

If he’s not even accused of a crime, how is wiping his phone “destroying evidence”? What is the crime being committed here? You are allowed to wipe your own phone, and technically he didn’t even do that.

Furthermore, asking a suspect for their passcode is bargain basement police work. Being surprised when this doesn’t work seems pretty incompetent. I think they’re throwing the book at him because they fucked up.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 10 hours ago* (3 children)

    Wow I wish there was a system in which we could have a say as to which nations we wage war against and for what reasons. It doesn’t seem like a good idea for one person to be able to wield the most powerful military ever created.

    Ah well, back to this bowl of Captain Crunch and Family Guy reruns.

  • source
  • [–] 62 points 3 days ago (50 children)

    Russian incompetence in this war quite frankly exceeds the level of Soviet collapse by an order of magnitude. I like to think Trump is being played by Putin, but it sure does seem like they’re on pretty much the same level strategically.

    What a perfect example of Soviet-style fascism. Putin needs a lead lobotomy.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

    Thanks for your clarification, as I should have been more clear. Law enforcement is a “government agency”, and Flock technically obtains permissions from them. There’s not much sense in installing cameras before securing some kind of contract.

    Flock tends to get contracts from law enforcement agencies, but then runs afoul of other regulatory agencies who are not notified before the equipment is installed. City councils, transportation authorities, public safety departments, constituents, and even State lawmakers are often not included in negotiations or even notified. This is the problem with Flock’s business practices that results in removal disputes.

    Once the cameras are in, they become difficult to dislodge and it takes regulatory force (and more money) to remove their privately owned equipment. Flock is not incentivized to remove their cameras or seek the proper approvals, and they know their product is popular with police and unpopular with the populace. So, that’s who they target for sales and permissions. Once the equipment is installed, they fight any regulatory removal process. As they garner more negative attention, their excuses and ploys become more odious. For example:

    In North Carolina in November 2023, a judge enjoined Flock staff from installing new cameras after a division of the state’s Department of Public Safety sought an injunction against it arguing the company had been operating without the required license. Flock disputed the complaint, claiming it did not need any sort of clearance from the North Carolina Alarm Systems Licensing Board because it “is not in the alarm system business”; the statute applies to any device used to detect illegal activity. Thomas said Flock has since been permitted to have a third party install its devices.

    A company like Flock should be fully expected to know that this excuse is absurd and that this law applied to them, But Flock chose to litigate it anyways, and did so because they expected to be allowed to continue, which they were.

    I reiterate my point that Flock is not in the public safety business because they don’t willingly work with public safety organizations. Flock is in the business of monetizing dragnet surveillance for law enforcement because that’s all they do.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    HyperNormalisation is a 2016 BBC documentary by British filmmaker Adam Curtis. It argues that following the global economic crises of the 1970s, governments, financiers and technological utopians gave up on trying to shape the complex "real world" and instead established a simpler "fake world" for the benefit of multi-national corporations that is kept stable by neoliberal governments.

     

    HyperNormalisation is a 2016 BBC documentary by British filmmaker Adam Curtis. It argues that following the global economic crises of the 1970s, governments, financiers and technological utopians gave up on trying to shape the complex "real world" and instead established a simpler "fake world" for the benefit of multi-national corporations that is kept stable by neoliberal governments.

     

    HyperNormalisation is a 2016 BBC documentary by British filmmaker Adam Curtis. It argues that following the global economic crises of the 1970s, governments, financiers and technological utopians gave up on trying to shape the complex "real world" and instead established a simpler "fake world" for the benefit of multi-national corporations that is kept stable by neoliberal governments.

     

    HyperNormalisation is a 2016 BBC documentary by British filmmaker Adam Curtis. It argues that following the global economic crises of the 1970s, governments, financiers and technological utopians gave up on trying to shape the complex "real world" and instead established a simpler "fake world" for the benefit of multi-national corporations that is kept stable by neoliberal governments.

     

    HyperNormalisation is a 2016 BBC documentary by British filmmaker Adam Curtis. It argues that following the global economic crises of the 1970s, governments, financiers and technological utopians gave up on trying to shape the complex "real world" and instead established a simpler "fake world" for the benefit of multi-national corporations that is kept stable by neoliberal governments.

     

    Marvin Heemeyer, the perpetrator of the 2004 Killdozer rampage in Granby, Colorado, was not an American folk hero. Rather, he was a selfish and greedy small business owner who took advantage of the town’s numerous efforts to appease and assist him in his petty squabbles with the local town’s government. When finally overruled, in response to these perceived civic slights he committed a violent act of terrorism that miraculously resulted in only his own death, by suicide.

    The mythic narrative ascribed to Heemeyer of a rugged individualist American pushed too far by the system, and who was justified in his violence, is a false one.

    submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by to c/world@lemmy.world
     

    According to the sources, family members told authorities that the PTSD stemmed from the fighting Lakanwal did in Afghanistan, where he fought in a CIA-sponsored-and-trained unit of the Afghan special forces known as a Zero Unit.

    Suspect struggled to assimilate

    Lakanwal appeared to have been unraveling for years, unable to hold a job and flipping between long, lightless stretches of isolation and taking sudden weekslong cross-country drives, emails obtained by The Associated Press indicate. His behavior deteriorated so sharply that a community advocate reached out to a refugee organization for help, fearing he was becoming suicidal.

    ‘He was clean on all checks’

    Lakanwal began working with the CIA around 2011, a senior US official told CNN. At the time, the CIA would have vetted him through a variety of databases, including the National Counterterrorism Center’s, to see whether he had any known ties to terrorist groups, the official said.

    Lakanwal would have also been vetted after he applied for asylum in 2024. It was granted in April, during the Trump administration. Noem on Sunday told NBC, “The vetting process all happened under (former President) Joe Biden’s administration.”

    The above quotes from the article were chosen by me to support this thesis:

    The Trump administration is actively lying about this event to justify their illegal and reckless deployment of the national guard and to cover the fact that they have installed a military force to perform policing, ironically mirroring the tactical stance in Afghanistan that resulted in similar attacks.

    view more: next ›