[–] 8 points 10 months ago*

I genuinely thought that film was supposed be, well not bad, but a selfish indulgence. Like we weren't supposed to like it, he just decided had the money and opportunity to make something that only appeals to him and we could watch it if we want. It's like he got the aux cable on a road trip and decided to put on industrial drone music.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 1 year ago (2 children)

    What she said is so obviously true that her comments biggest flaw is it's redundancy. She's talking about Tomiwa Owolade's words on racism in Britain. A copper isn't going to spot you from 50 yards away and stop you based on the fact that you're Irish or Jewish because they can't see that. Security isn't going to follow you around a shop and hurry you out the door because you're Irish or Jewish because they can't see that.

    I hate identity politics and hierarchies of oppression and language pedantry and all that more than the next person. But when you pretend to not understand an argument which is so obvious and valid, it's hard to believe you're here with honest intent.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 18 points 1 year ago

    He's right. It doesn't mean you hate foreigners to understand why bosses would prefer to hire someone with less rights and who needs less money to raise their family through remittances.

  • source
  • [–] [S] 20 points 1 year ago

    The underlying tech was designed with HD video conferencing in mind. It'll happily max out your connection. As long as the server has enough bandwidth to upload one stream and the average peer can handle uploading one stream it's theoretically infinitely scalable

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 11 points 1 year ago

    This is a very "nine women can make a baby in one month".

    The idea that there can even be two half as good developers is a misunderstanding of how anything works. If it worked like that, the study would be a dud because people could just run two AIs for 160% productivity.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  •  

    For example, Britain's national mapping organisation's brand is associated in our national consciousness with going to a small shop in a quaint village to get a map showing how to walk up a mountain. It's called Ordnance Survey. If that sounds like Artillery Research to you, that's because the project started because the king wanted to know how to accurately bomb Scotland.

    submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by to c/techtakes@awful.systems
     

    So I was just reading this thread about deepseek refusing to answer questions about Tianenmen square.

    It seems obvious from screenshots of people trying to jailbreak the webapp that there's some middleware that just drops the connection when the incident is mentioned. However I've already asked the self hosted model multiple controversial China questions and it's answered them all.

    The poster of the thread was also running the model locally, the 14b model to be specific, so what's happening? I decide to check for myself and lo and behold, I get the same "I am sorry, I cannot answer that question. I am an AI assistant designed to provide helpful and harmless responses."

    Is it just that specific model being censored? Is it because it's the qwen model it's distilled from that's censored? But isn't the 7b model also distilled from qwen?

    So I check the 7b model again, and this time round that's also censored. I panic for a few seconds. Have the Chinese somehow broken into my local model to cover it up after I downloaded it.

    I check the screenshot I have of it answering the first time I asked and ask the exact same question again, and not only does it work, it acknowledges the previous question.

    So wtf is going on? It seems that "Tianenmen square" will clumsily shut down any kind of response, but Tiananmen square is completely fine to discuss.

    So the local model actually is censored, but the filter is so shit, you might not even notice it.

    It'll be interesting to see what happens with the next release. Will the censorship be less thorough, stay the same, or will china again piss away a massive amount of soft power and goodwill over something that everybody knows about anyway?

     

    Just listened to him ramble on about AI for an eternity on the radio.

    We're all going to die.

    Are his advisors all so lacking in knowing anything as to have never spotted a mistake in Google's AI interventions.

    We're just on the brink of bankruptcy and he's diving headfirst into what the rest of the world is beginning to realise is a boondoggle.

     

    As far as I know this isn't a feature that exists, but I know the protocol should make it fairly easy.

    What I'm thinking is for Lemmy to basically have the option to inherit the comment thread when posting a URL to another fediverse service.

    E.g. If crossposting a Lemmy thread, you get a tickbox saying "inherit comment section" or something and it makes the new thread effectively a symlink to the original.

    This could also be used to bootstrap other fediverse services like pixelfed and peertube by enabling people to comment directly from their Lemmy instance.

    view more: next ›