its not that simple. whatever opinion you might on llms have you have to agree this is oversimplifying at best.
Kinda like how very AI company in silicon valley was scrambling to figure out Deepseek worked when it released for free?
You shoved it in my face now
.. That can go wrong in so many ways though
sure, for a smaller segment of republicans
im criticizing the broad strokes ppl are making by correlating republicans to "literal" nazis
Again - i was talking about the effects of not using correct language. Grammar like punctuation was not my point
english isnt even my first language
how am I a right wing/troll account for commenting on how language is important
the polarization here is unreal haha
Are said republicans members of the national socialist german workers part? No.
If anything - this minority of republicans you are speaking of should be called "neo-nazi".
must say I hit a nerve here, hence unpopular opinion. funny how automatically ppl assume I have an hidden agenda
unpopular opinion; I believe in the value of definitions of words. I'm not republican (shouldn't matter) but by bending definitions of words like "nazi" - you're diminishing the people who went through the atrocities of WW2
Kind of similar to how you shouldn't say "rape" for something that isn't. in effect you're diminishing rape victims
"nazi" literally means a member of the far-right National Socialist German Workers' Party. Fascist pigs? No doubt. Just don't change history...
certainly not the first case. maybe to reach the public
It can deliver.. your personal information to the states +third-parties
since when could search engines differentiate ai content from original?
Obviously they can filter out low-effort content - but llm content that has "value" can rarely be detected unless data poisoning, afaik
view more:
next ›