No, it's one of those "don't believe the targeted harassment campaign" arguments
I just said it looks like it's from this artist, alright?
It wasn't Google, it was this one: https://www.labnol.org/reverse
I didn't find the direct image, but it did link more to the artist
Google reverse image search
Some really weird choices here for sure. But it seems to be made by Auckland artist Toby Morris: https://www.lambiek.net/artists/m/morris_toby.htm
This is the answer, I think. However, as far as I understand it, we can get outsized reactions that are not evolutionary sensible. This oversensitivity can be just a random trait that might not be helpful at all in the current environment (or any other previous environment). It can also just be a psychology response to a traumatic event for example. Humans are quite complex.
Looks like a creature straight out of The Dark Crystal
There really needs to be a proper federated alternative to imdb and co
Big federated version for all those sites would be awesome! The problem is probably that there are already like 12 different ones
What do you think is the reason? I would assume it's mostly for their data? Or would they need with the ranking to help their movies?
I wonder if the article says anything about that
What about that? If they bought it, but haven't played it, yet, should they not have to pay for for it?
Or does that somehow make people buying an indie game and bragging about having fun completing the game, then refunding it afterwards, look better?
Developer Mateo Covic, who went viral for complaining that thousands of people had refunded his game after finishing it in less than two hours, says he's not actually unhappy about the number of refunds or money he lost, or even Steam's policy in general—he was merely expressing frustration with players who "bragged about having a fun time with the game and refunding it after completion."