But he also says in the initial post "anyone who got a LemonLime tattoo", which while not saying directly "the company logo" suggests something different from just choosing anything as your tattoo.

Blessed be the fruit.

I remember reading a few days ago that OpenAI basically ordered 3 times as much RAM as they could use this year. There are also data centers fully equipped but not turned on as the local power grid could not handle the added demand.

Erm, this is a memes community...

in Wisconsin in the US

I think we can safely disregard that then.

I think it depends on what the intent is for the cut. In this case, it was to provide a version that is as close to the book as possible. I agree that what you describe could be a good cut too, but the goal isn't the same.

I see "eat the rich" as "use them as fertilizer".

The article makes no mention of any missile or warhead, only op speaks about that, be careful.

Yet again, the age old law "if a headline ends with a question mark, the answer is no" proves itself true.

Unfortunately true, I agree. There would be an enormous amount of work to be done, starting with replacing that admin, and it would take time and effort. Still, I don't see a way, even with all the benevolence in the world, to restrict reproduction in a positive way. Also, I honestly believe that it would end up having a similar effect to banning alcohol for example: people wouldn't stop reproducing, they would hide it, which in turn means no access to healthcare or education for those children, as they would have to be hidden from the government, thus complicating things even further.

If you bothered to read the whole thread, I do propose a solution. Education.

Please explain to me how you would go about selecting who can reproduce and who can't then. I've asked this question multiple times and so far none of you "eugenics are good when it favors me" seem to want to answer it.

Eugenics is about purity of your population. That is a textbook component of fascism, whether you like it or not.