[–] 3 points 1 week ago

yeah and the paintbrush somehow has abstracted access to millions of proprietary and copyleft licensed source code in forms of weight.

this is a clear misuse and abuse of any fair use rights, and clear push to centralisation of copyright to only a few companies with big budgets that can defend themselves.

i mean, can you really challenge and win against openai, a company backed by the govt, that your copyleft source code are misused as training data?

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    shame for the software engineers, marketing, the middle managers, the project owner of not over communicating that THERE IS NO PRACTICAL WAYS OF ENCRYPTING MACHINE LEARNING MODELS INPUT

    therefore, your chat are plainly read and known by the provider, lest you trust the privacy policy of a company, which WILL ALWAYS change anyway. There are no mathematical trust here, such as encryption in instant messaging like matrix.

  • source
  •  

    In your opinion what's the difference between the two? In my opinion both terms are frequently used interchangeably in the workplace.

    But I'd like to consider myself as an engineer, because although I don't consider myself to be good at it, I think I cares about the software that I worked on, its interaction with other services, the big picture, and different kinds of small optimizations.

    I mean, what is even engineering?

    view more: next ›