[–] 1 point 2 months ago (2 children)

I have one and it's great, although I don't have any HA information on it, as I don't have a lot of information worth having on a screen that's not live data.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago (2 children)

    I recently moved all my PSP library to a Retroid Pocket 4 Pro, because of battery life and upscaling, but my PSP is still working, the thing is that being able to charge everything with USB-C is really comfortable for me, and I'm really scared of modding a USB-C port on my PSP. The performance on the RP4 is really good.

  • source
  •  

    From the page description:

    Celebrate the legacy of the Game Boy with a curated collection of 30 neo retro indie games inspired by the golden age of handheld gaming. Crafted by modern developers who grew up with pixels, batteries, and tiny screens, these pocket-sized legends prove that great adventures never go out of style, all compatible with original hardware.

    From chunky pixels to timeless design, the Handheld Heritage Bundle honors the Game Boy era through original indie games built with retro hearts and modern creativity. The bundle contains platformers, shooters, RPGs and many worlds that await for you thumbs to experience. There is something for everyone in this celebration of the console that defined portable play.

    [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Timing first, friction later: Whatsapp was first, it extended like wildfire in Latin America before the 2014 buy in by Meta. I attribute it to the ease of configuration: you didn't need an email, it was just your phone number, and then all your contacts were reachable. It didn't lose traction even when it changed from free app to "free for a year". Friction came later, Telegram gained some ground but it was very niche, my friends that were in CS were using it "for the bots and the stickers" but you needed to invite your contacts to use it and it didn't make sense if they already had Whatsapp. Later, more and more businesses started using Whatsapp to chat with customers and eventually it became the default.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    yes. there's two branching discussions here:

    • Space as a scientific topic, it needs to be understood. Our observation of reality is very local, and although we can prove that some of our assumptions about physics, life and civilization work on our neighborhood, it doesn't mean that they're the same everywhere. That alone is sufficient reason for me, to explore.
    • Space as the new frontier. Many if not all exploration done on planet Earth has been, in some shape or form, resource-motivated. Lands, food, medicine, minerals, routes, are all found through exploration and normally through people spending money looking for a return over investment. Space is no different.

    I think the interesting part is where this two branches touch: If we ever plan on capturing an asteroid for mining, the technology needs to be there to do it, and hopefully the technology is about the benefit of all humankind. This kind of development is showing us the way to move forward and solve problems. Imagine a world when we don't need to destroy ecosystems in order to get iron because all iron comes from off-world.

  • source
  •  

    for me RAM is a perfected technology, new buses will come, more speed, but it will fundamentally be the same manufacturing process, same materials. The prospect is that LLMs will keep getting larger, more RAM will be required, and the prices will keep getting higher, or along the curve, while the demand will keep up with it because everything has RAM in it. Do you see a point in the future where the industry forks out of this, and there's an alternative where the end user is not affected as much from the demand of this resource?

    view more: next ›