166W an hour? You can power a laptop and a light for that. What on earth were they smoking to say this is worthwhile..

If it was for your spine I'd say no. There's enough evidence against imagining a spine unless you've got serious enough concerns about red flags. Rationale being people are very emotive about their spine.. so even if theyre pain free seeing things like "bulge" "protrusion" "stenosis" is something that people will hold onto for ever.

I can't speak for the pelvic side of things. I also can't speak for your health anxieties. Maybe have a chat with the GP and tell them you only want to hear about the report if there's anything that needs action?

Please explain

You're kidding 😂

Turn that frown upside down, oh wait, you can't move your face.

Every single ingredient panel I've seen (per 100g) reports sodium in mg.. so seems perfectly reasonable no?

Yeah true regarding birthrates.. but I think it probably catapulted median age

This website states that in 1960 median age was around 20 (comparable internationally), median age in 2025 was 42( international was 31)

You'd think they'd remove the keyboard from the photo..

Well yes, but also no. I think it was only really heavily policed in the 70s and early 80s then was lifted so regional and rural could have a second child (wiki says by '84 the single child policy only impacted 35% of the population). Still goes to show by forcibly dropping birthrates how much it destroys future planning

Creating a stoma from the wrong end of the bowel.. that be bloody wild.

Well this is shit.. think it's time to write in to state MPs about the gross loss of privacy in the Trojan of "protecting children"

Pretty straight forward, put them on as many rooftops as you can regardless of suitability or quality components. Collect government rebate +/- co contribution.

Very classy. A nice full bodied Shiraz in winter, Pinot noir if it's a summer catching.