Thank You!
Thank you!
I understand your intention and I appreciate it, truly, but it doesn't help the problem because I've known for a while now (as shown in the Modlog screenshots) who's responsible for the ban. And of course, my point is that I can't contact them because they're only active in Digital Art (the community I was banned from). I can't comment on their posts, and I insist, Lemmy doesn't have secure direct messaging. Even if I wanted to contact you to chat, the only way would be to register on those external apps I mentioned, Element.io or Matrix, which I won't do. And if I did, I already know how they'd think of me, considering how they treated me.
If I wanted to talk to you, my message would get lost.

Uh... Why me? I don't know what to say about that.

Fue un error pedir ayuda y justicia en este lugar, está hecho más para discusión que arreglo. Siempre gana la mayoría por más que hayan argumentos a mi favor. Bueno, es todo. Este caso estaba perdido desde antes de un veredicto, vaya pena. Yo digo la verdad sin jugar al victimismo, le arda a quién le arda, si es injusto, no me doblego por opinión de rebaño.

O sea, según tú, ellos pueden descartar mi arte, bajo una etiqueta que no es, porque ya expliqué no, una no dos, sino más de diez veces que no entra en lo furry, entiendo el baneo de un par de dibujos como el de Shinebone Alley al ser más confuso, pero el resto… Wow. Debo creer que esto fue “justo”. Increíble. Y sin poder apelar por capricho de los moderores. Bueno, estoy acostumbrada a lo injusto de las comunidades. Y aún así es decepcionante, tenía una mínima esperanza de recibir apoyo y un poco de justicia por algo que no hice.

I already explained how the log works; the modlog is only visible to the moderator. It has nothing to do with the public log, which anyone can see. The moderator already showed the modlog, but that doesn't excuse her from the fact that she continues to justify the ban, even if she didn't do it herself. She could remove it or tell the moderator responsible for the ban, and they don't want to.
But of course, I'm always the one defending myself, the bad guy and the "ignorant one."
Necesitan un villano en un cuento, y el sesgo muy cargado de "los gringos tienen razón y no aceptamos razones lógicas".
I already explained how the log works; the modlog is only visible to the moderator. It has nothing to do with the public log, which anyone can see. The moderator already showed the modlog, but that doesn't excuse her from the fact that she continues to justify the ban, even if she didn't do it herself. She could remove it or tell the moderator responsible for the ban, and they don't want to.
But of course, I'm always the one defending myself, the bad guy and the "ignorant one."
That's a "bureaucratic trap." Sending me to an office you know is locked and whose key you have in your pocket. It's an incredibly cynical move: someone offering a solution ("talk to them") knowing full well that the platform doesn't have a working direct messaging (DM) system, I'm not going to use external apps, and I can't post in a community where I'm banned.
It's the equivalent of telling me, "If you want me to put you in handcuffs, go talk to the guards on the other side of that locked door." You're literally the only one I could contact, and you ignored me, even though you could have told your "colleagues" that someone wants to communicate but can't because of the ban. You're the only one I contacted because you're in communities I can visit. The other moderators are sitting pretty with an unfair warning that I never violated, and it's their ignorance that caused this problem. "This is exhausting," of course it's exhausting, but you yourself keep dragging this out even though you still have the title of moderator. It's incredibly ironic that you and the moderators who have the power to end everything with two clicks, complain of being tired in front of the person who has had to research, debate with 40 people and defend their artistic identity against a wall of ignorance for days. Do you think I didn't get a headache a few days ago arguing with so many incompetent people who think they own a term they misuse and judge my work based on that ignorance? Everything could have been solved in two clicks, but no, they prefer to keep justifying their inability to listen to their users, instead of providing a real solution called listening without causing more problems.
The "Modlog" fallacy: You yourself admit that you use Photon to see the logs clearly. This confirms my point: Lemmy only shows what's public to the average user, not what you control. Even I understand that simple explanation and see the error, because Photon isn't for public use on the platform without being a moderator. Furthermore, you admit to having the power to unban someone the whole time, and you didn't use it. You probably didn't even mention that you got into trouble because of moderator X, and you didn't tell that moderator about the issue, even though they're active in the community, as I saw a moment ago. And since they're only active in the community where I was banned, I can't contact them through a comment; otherwise, I would.
Confirmation of timing: You just confirmed that the logs show the time of the action (the ban), not the creation of the post. This proves I was right all along: the ban happened weeks ago. My confusion, which I already mentioned in my other comment, stemmed from the mistake of continuing to show my drawings and then disappearing.
The gaslighting of the "misunderstanding"—that everything is a "language misunderstanding"—you continue to underestimate my knowledge, even the most basic and obvious, but you don't take into account the fact that I research what you tell me. The misunderstanding was seeing my drawings untouched less than a week ago; the lack of definition and prejudices you have in art are not a "misunderstanding." You impose it and don't appeal to complaints. It's a condescending way of saying, "It's not that I'm lazy, it's that you don't understand English and you got confused."
"If you're going to come back, you'll get banned; if you're not going to come back, why do you want the unban?"
The reality: It's about cleaning up something I didn't even do. The ban is an unfair stain based on a lack of understanding of an art concept that doesn't apply to mine. Demanding an unban means demanding they acknowledge that the sanction was a technical and artistic error. It's not just a whim; it's about the dignity of defending my art and myself.
She's practically admitting she has the power to lift the ban, but she doesn't want to. However, she keeps replying, justifying, and deflecting the issue with "it's not my responsibility, but I still have the ban removal button" instead of simply doing the right thing or stopping making excuses and being honest about how she just insists my art infringes on something when it doesn't.
It's an old trick to wash her hands of the matter.
