sorted by: new top controversial old
Evolution is real in c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world
[+] -6 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Instead of answering me, it would be much more helpful to come up with an counter argument to mentioned arguments.

We may debate, it wont resolve something. Time will reveal what is needed to be known or to be accepted. So go on have fun, scroll through lemmy.

It is just that, you are lazy so you dont debate and instead you shout out hate. If you are not going to debate and express the opposing side that they are wrong; you are simply an asshole, waste of resources(from my pov of course, it all is relative).

Have a nice day, btw I am an evolutionist(not that it changes sth).

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Evolution is real in c/atheistmemes@lemmy.world
    [+] -16 points 2 years ago (15 children)

    Why the fuck people did downvote you?!

    Many of evolutionists blame those who are against or suspicious about evolution with zealotry but when they come up with real arguments and questions, you become the zealots. You fucking hypocrites

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • context
    • Reddit gone down (desktop and mobile app reddit not working) in c/technology@lemmy.world
    Open Source Keyboard with Swipe for Android in c/privacy@lemmy.ml
    OC: Me since Bun 1.0.0 in c/programmer_humor@programming.dev
    [Sway] idk in c/unixporn@lemmy.ml
    [qtile] eww in c/unixporn@lemmy.world
    What's your favorite tech podcast? in c/technology@lemmy.world
    Do you believe in God? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
    [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    I think what "god" does mean for me, you and others are different. Also same goes for "believe" and "you". I believe, these kinds of topics are way out of our minds' league and even we could comprehend and discuss those things(god, reality, logic etc.) we still would be using wrong tools like language and our current logic system. So both the tools we use, and our intelligence is not enough to answer this question.

    But still, if you want a yes or no answer; I would say no without hesitation.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    YSK: You can still see recommendations feed in Youtube with History turned off in c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world
    Do you donate to Wikipedia? Why or why not? in c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
    We just survived the hottest 36 days ever recorded in c/world@lemmy.world
    33
    Where can I learn algorithms and data structures? (lemm.ee)
     

    I know this can be easily searched over internet, but I want to know your experience. I don't want a medium article listing algorithm courses.

    I found Algorithms from Princeton University in coursera, but course is too old and many resources they have provided are not working right now. I would apprentice it if you could share more of an video type resources because I am not good with programming books, I can not focus them.

    Thanks in advance...

    1
    To what extent can I be skeptical? What is our limit of comprehension? (lemm.ee)
     

    Couple of days ago I saw a post about on atheist community about a quote saying atheist can't base their morals on anything.

    I commented that if religion didn't accept some premises like god, they wouldn't either. Some said I am wrong and downvoted me. So I decided to post here about to what extent can I be skeptical about premises, to see where I am mistaken (or commenters).

    Before that post, for a while I had an idea that even the analytical truth/necessary truth (whatever you name it) like "a is equal to a" are premises which can not be proven (since they are the basics of our logic, which will we be in use to prove claims) even though they seem us to be true by intuition. They just have to be accepted to be able to further think about other things.

    So my question is since we can question the correctness of basics of our logic and cant find an answer, we can not justify or learn anything. Also, there lays the problem of do we really understand the same thing from the same concepts, and does language limit us?

    If I am mistaken, which is highly probable, please correct me and don't judge. I am not much of a philosophy reader.

    I would really appreciate it if you could share some resources (video, article, book, anything...) about limits of our understanding, logic, language and related topics.

    Thanks in advance...

    view more: next ›