In this particular case it is speed with respect to the fixed reference frame of the game.

"speedy thing go in, speedy thing come out."

So A.

Large dynamic range is a good thing, in audio and video.

a good thing for accurately reproducing the original signal.

But many people watching a show at home would like to just watch the damn movie without anything being particularly loud or resorting to subtitles. Decent range compression achieves that. Applying information theory to a Sunday night movie is stupid.

Tightly bound cables/wiring is my pet hate. Even if there's room to add stuff it makes tracing anything a nightmare.

I would absolutely prefer to trace something in the second pic.

Do you understand that the whole point of self driving cars is to not have humans with eyes and depth perception doing the driving?

Computers can't even reliably differentiate between B and 8.

We use “cameras” for object detection

lol

My kid tried to drive it into a hedge and it wouldn't let them. Not the same as accelerating from across the road at a house but also the car makes no self driving claims.

if you point it at a house and floor the accelerator from a few hundred meters away?

I don't know for sure and I can't think of a good way to test. It certainly wouldn't hit it when "driving itself" with smart cruise control or if I tried to drive into it from a few metres away.

If your misunderstanding of how a machine works is that fundamental I don't think there's a reason to continue this.

The same applies to stopping it from driving full speed into a house.

It really really really doesn't

I want vehicles that rely on cameras for detecting obstacles to be banned.

Anything that uses reasonable object detection methods should be banned if it lets you drive into a house. My Kia won't let me drive into a house.

What do you think the LLM is using for reference when generating code? It can't create from nothing.