It seems she was okay with the security team having guns, but in general, not for the common person. In my mind, adapting to reality (and the 2nd amendment) she should be okay with both groups having guns. I think we (you and I) hold the same position on this.

Not privacy related, but ... another double standard is that she is against guns yet her security team was armed at her wedding.

The best book to read in order to stop believing is ... The Bible. Have at it and enjoy!

A good pepper spray. Anything from POM for example.

Could be. I hadn't thought of it that way. I was thinking more like the person can't or isn't willing to put the work in to do something, so they use AI as a shortcut.

You can't get points for non-speeding violations, so that might not be it since the focus is on "super speeders".

If the goal is to make money, then the quality of what is being made is secondary at best. People on the receiving end of things made with AI know that. They are leery of being taken advantage of because AI can easily put out quantity where quality and accuracy may be lacking. Also, people don't like to be fooled. Often AI is used and not noted as being used. Instead, the person using the AI takes credit for it themselves. I haven't even gotten to the amount of energy AI uses, the jobs lost in the name of AI and so on.

... and the article doesn't even say what speed over a speed limit qualifies as a "super speeder" event.

Its all about them short term benefits. Live for today, screw tomorrow.

Praise, worship and obey or you will be punished. Sure ... whatever ...

Beatings will continue until morale improves.

What an embarrassment to have an official government web page like that.