Unfortunately I don't think caution is a virtue that is rewarding in most circumstances to most people. New tools need to be extensively and rigorously tested before being used.

I don't even think it's a individualism/capitalism thing unfortunately. I've been in cultures/societies that are not either and both still use these tools to further their goals. It's just power at the end of the day.

It's like the nuclear bomb. It doesn't really matter what the underlying economic system of US or USSR were, they still used it to further their goals.

I think the insidiousness is in the power of the tool. For most people it's just too powerful to not use. I can be an excellent photographer or artist and not make a dime if I don't engage in social media.

For me that's the sad thing. Self-hosted small models have been extremely useful to me to perform selective tasks that completely changed how things work. It's allowed me to manage my research and information processing so much better. But I also know most people don't put any limiters on it and use it for anything and everything.

It's a powerful tool that people are using without restraint. I think this to be expected in the first few years after any new powerful tool is found. Humans will find a way to mess it up.

See radium cosmetics and ideas to dig the Panama canal using hydrogen bombs. Social media is probably as much or even more dangerous than LLMs.

Maybe it's just the colorblind ones?

These people are not immigrants? The country of China was created around them and they have the right to speak and use their language as anyone of Han descent might?

As someone who used to travel to NYC a lot, bodegas are a marvel because the supermarkets are crazy expensive. I still can't believe millions of people live like that.

Yeah. Same energy as 'why are you making me hit you?'

The ship was waiting to surrender to Sri Lanka I think. There was another one that had priority that did surrender while the one that was hit was next in line.

That's the sad reality right now though. To reach the crazies you need people who can get to them. The way things are, they see every outside criticism as invalid and unimportant. You need someone who can cut across that.

I'm curious how you would feel about a news platform that doesn't use gender as a lens of viewing things through at all. Completely de-gender everything using gender neutral language.

Something like "Brave bystander rescue drowning baby while the parent struggles to respond", applied to everything.

As of now it feels like an arms race. The bad actors highlight gender/sexuality disproportionately for every little negative thing they can find and the good guys respond by highlighting the actual insane amount of good things these groups do.

They couldn't be even bothered to do the decent thing at this point and train and arm the rebels! /s

I think it's sort of a big problem to solve because there's no corporate backing or down stream derivatives contributing a lot back, making a fully curated repo hard to achieve. I wouldn't mind a fully vetted AUR either but I don't think the community can get there with the current resources.

Nix honestly sounds really awesome. When I tried it long, it kept on running into edge cases for things that weren't really working well like properitery drivers or old ass packages that needed a lot of workarounds. It sounds like it would be amazing on a server/vm.

You want little bit of the ability to customize everything without having to compile from scratch every time? You want a well documented system that has excellent documentation and a community that digs into most edge cases? You want upstream fixes ASAP because your team of volunteers are struggling to backport fixes?

It has its place. I'm saying this as someone who uses Debian and red hat derivatives extensively.

To me slow roll, tumbleweed and fedora were good contenders for the same slot but none of them let you completely fuck around with the design like Arch does.