[–] 5 points 1 month ago

Sure, let's not keep this culturally protected 200m long stretch of trees. This image massively compresses the distance between these trees, surrounding this area are large parklands with much more nature-like planting, so no thank you this one place can stay.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago (5 children)

    Yes, planted for aestetics, also the home of dozens of bird species, because its poplar trees that very much belong on the waters edge. As far into a millennia old city as this is you really aren't going to see many "natural" trees.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] 17 points 1 month ago (7 children)

    This is literally two rows of trees next to a river, you couldn't get further from a forest without removing the trees. I get not liking plantation forests, I don't either, but this is just not that. Its also right next to a fairly natural part of the Danube wich is quite beautiful in its own right.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • view more: next ›