Ich dachte, ich hätte es hier gelesen. Ich ziehe jetzt eh um, aber danke für den Tipp.
EDIT: Ich hab folgendes gefunden und das funktioniert, danke an alle und danke an den Verfasser!
Für die Leute, die keine offene Browser Session haben, hier ein kleines, aber funktionales Bash Script, welches im Ausführungsverzeichnis eine myFedditUserData.json erstellt, welche bei anderen Instanzen importiert werden kann.
Anforderungen:
- Linux/Mac OS X Installation
- jq installiert (Unter Ubuntu/Debian/Mint z.B. per
sudo apt install -y jq
Anleitung:
- Folgendes Script unter einem beliebigen Namen mit
.shEndung abspeichern, z.B.getMyFedditUsserData.sh - Script in beliebigen Textprogramm öffnen, Username/Mail und Passwort ausfüllen (optional Instanz ändern)
- Terminal im Ordner des Scripts öffnen und
chmod +x getMyFedditUsserData.shausführen (Namen eventuell anpassen) - ./getMyFedditUsserData.sh
- Nun liegt im Ordner neben dem Script eine frische
myFedditUserData.json
Anmerkung: Das Script ist recht simpel, es wird ein JWT Bearer Token angefragt und als Header bei dem GET Aufruf von https://feddit.de/api/v3/user/export_settings mitgegeben. Wer kein Linux/Mac OS X zur Verfügung hat, kann den Ablauf mit anderen Mitteln nachstellen.
Das Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Basic login script for Lemmy API
# CHANGE THESE VALUES
my_instance="https://feddit.de" # e.g. https://feddit.nl
my_username="" # e.g. freamon
my_password="" # e.g. hunter2
########################################################
# Lemmy API version
API="api/v3"
########################################################
# Turn off history substitution (avoid errors with ! usage)
set +H
########################################################
# Login
login() {
end_point="user/login"
json_data="{\"username_or_email\":\"$my_username\",\"password\":\"$my_password\"}"
url="$my_instance/$API/$end_point"
curl -H "Content-Type: application/json" -d "$json_data" "$url"
}
# Get userdata as JSON
getUserData() {
end_point="user/export_settings"
url="$my_instance/$API/$end_point"
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer ${JWT}" "$url"
}
JWT=$(login | jq -r '.jwt')
printf 'JWT Token: %s\n' "$JWT"
getUserData | jq > myFedditUserData.json
Und der besondere Spaß ist, dass sie dann, wenn sie abgelaufen sind, Hautkrebs verursachen können.
Ich hab es gedacht, aber war mir sicher, dass es was anderes sein MUSS. So irrt man sich.
Was zum Fick ist Tzabatta?
How would that work? I couldn't find it in that post.
I agree, but most games also have a higher ratio of value to cost. If I buy a game for 50 bucks, I'll play it for many hours, let's say 50. So that will be 1 per hour, pretty good. If I buy a new movie, that isn't available for subscription streaming, that ratio is easily double. If I have a subscription and need another now, that also lowers it's value. It also comes with lower comfort and ease of consumption, as you mentioned.
Another great example is YouTube premium. I'll gladly pay 5 or 7 bucks for adfree content, not 14 though. I don't need YouTube music. So I block ads where I can and donate to creators, if I can afford it. They could have had my money, but they are, simply, greedy.
I also hate it, when deals are altered without my consent. It makes me feel like a sucker, and therefore makes it less likely for me to keep investing.
Because often enough, results in science contradict religious belief. Heliocentric model, for example.
You most likely won't utilize these speeds in a home lab, but I understand why you want them. I do too. I settled for 2.5GBit because that was a sweet spot in terms of speed, cost and power draw. In total, I idle at about 60W for following systems:
- Lenovo M90q (i7 10700, 32GB, 3 x 1 TB SSD) running Proxmox, 15W idle
- Custom NAS (Ryzen 2400G, 16GB, 4x12TB HDD)v running Truenas (30W idle)
- Firewall (N5105, 8GB) running OPNsense (8W idle)
- FritzBox 6660 Cable, which functions as a glorified access point, 10W idle
Weird, isn't it. A lot of those successful services have cute little mascots. It influences me more than it should.
I know exactly what you mean. I'd also prefer Debian, Mint or Fedora. Each has its weaknesses, but you got to start somewhere. Go for it, then decide for yourself. It's not that hard to switch again.
Ich nehme an, dass hier physische Hardware vermietet wird. Häufig ist es aber günstiger, virtuelle Hardware (z.B. CPU Kerne) zu nutzen - man teilt sich dann die CPU mit anderen, während bei ersterem nur du darauf Zugriff hast. Ist vereinfacht, aber so mehr oder weniger...
Network design. I started my homelab / selfhost journey about a year ago. Network design was the topic that scared me most. To challenge myself, and to learn about it, I bought myself a decent firewall box with 4 x 2.5G NICs. I installed OPNsense on it, following various guides. I setup my 3 LAN ports as a network bridge to connect my PC, NAS and server. I set the filtering to be applied between these different NICs, as to learn more about the behavior of the different services. If I want to access anything on my server from my PC, there needs to be a rule allowing it. All other trafic is blocked. This setup works great so far an I'm really happy with it.
Here is where I ran into problems. I installed Proxmox on my server and am in the process of migrating all my services from my NAS over there. I thought that all trafic from a VM in Proxmox would go this route: first VM --> OPNsense --> other VM. Then, I could apply the appropriate firewall rules. This however, doesnt seem to be the case. From what I've learned, VMs in Proxmox can communicate freely with each other by default. I don't want this.
From my research, I found different ideas and opposing solutions. This is where I could use some guidance.
- Use VLANs to segregate the VMs from each other. Each VLAN gets a different subnet.
- Use the Proxmox firewall to prevent communication between VMs. I'd rather avoid this, so I don't have to apply firewall rules twice. I could also install another OPNsense VM and use that, but same thing.
- Give up on filtering traffic between my PC, NAS and server. I trust all those devices, so it wouldn't be the end of the world. I just wanted the most secure setup I could do with my current knowledge.
Is there any way to just force the VM traffic through my OPNsense firewall? I thought this would be easy, but couldn't find anything or just very confusing ideas.
I also have a second question. I followed TechnoTim to setup Treafik and use my local DNS and wildcard certificates. Now, I can reach my services using service.local.example.com, which I think is neat. However, in order to do this, it was suggested to use one docker network called proxy. Each service would be assigned this network and Traefik uses lables to setup the routes. '
Would't this allow all those services to communciate freely? Normally, each container has it's own network and docker uses iptables to isolate them from each other.
Is this still the way to go? I'm a bit overwhelmed by all those options.
Is my setup overkill? I'd love to hear what you guys think! Thank you so much!
view more:
next ›