[–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (1 child)

Just for clarification, I don't think it'll be fast. It will just be faster than without it.

Also, I think we'll hang on to a lot because the survivor base will likely be made up of people from all walks of life. STEM Professionals, teachers, carpenters, you name it. And as long as we learned our lesson about religion, we'll pass that knowledge on.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] 0 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Mass extinction, not complete extinction.

    It's not hubris. Humans are one of, if not the most adaptable species on the planet. Unless it gets so hot that the caves become uninhabitable, we'll squeak by.

    I see it like this: If there is a way, we will find it. It's in our DNA.

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • [–] [S] -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

    That's where we disagree. I think there will be small inhabitable areas of the planet for centuries, at least. If not, there are caves. Humans are nothing if not -persistent.-

  • source
  • parent
  • context
  • submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
     

    Of the following, which of the two personality types do you generally align with?

    When approaching a given situation or idea, do you typically focus on details first, or start with the bigger picture, filling in details second?

    Edit for clarity: I'm not asking anyone to strictly identify with one or the other. It's a question of where on the spectrum between them you fall.

    I am more of a big picture person and my partner is more of a details first person.

    view more: next ›