I think the 100 - 1 + 1 is that he learnt a pattern like: rand() % (upper bound - lower bound + 1) without understanding it which gets a number between 100 and 1. Then because it gets rounded down he adds 1. For the multiple fetches some are for different API entrances which could be individually limited???? and duplicates maybe for.. I want around 50% to be at this? It's a bit hard to read and remember whole while typing on a phone.

If this were the exact wording it would be hard to find someone not looking like that. You are using hard words for my trans dense self. It took me like half a minute to load. But yes it's a funny meme but I am required by my head to respond seriously to memes for some reason.

I am not there T^T

As much as I agree with you on everything you have said a big amount of society would not agree with you assuming they understood entirety of your statement. A part of legal system is not just prevention and reformation, but punishment. It is barbaric but it stems from society as a whole. I am kind of glad that we were told that in uni (computer law for 2 credits) nobody could think of the last part. I like my uni and the people, but it was not so hard to notice it outside and sometimes with even a ridiculous amount of hypocrisy.

Debian (for 2 days because I broke it) -> Mint -> Arch (for an hour) -> CachyOS. I like Cachy and it has been half a year. With the package optimization I don't really see myself switching to anything else.

Now that there is something a little bit relevant any Lemmy client recommendations? I've been using Jerboa for a year and it feels as if it were stuck on a same beta version without any progress since then.

No, I am not. I did think about my answer despite it being short.

I will just grow it out until it touches the floor.

Are indie better because of capitalism or despite capitalism? It's despite.

Undertail

I dislike Spotify even if it were free and without ads.

you could morally treat dead human relatives and friends as a shared property. Desecrating property aka. vandalism is not allowed. Every living owner of said property would then have to agree, which would have to be decided by let's say guardians of a corpse selected in the body's last will. Out of practicality it would be opt-in with following examples: I consent (giving rights to state), I don't (default, giving rights to the people), I will leave the decision up to <name(s)>. Not consenting option would be almost impossible to clear as there would always be somebody wanting their shared property to not be desecrated unless outside of civilization where nobody else can exercise their rights in a arbitrary time window. It is an distinction between morality and practicality. While fucking a corpse by itself would mean nothing others would be still deeply mentally hurt, but this legal framework would clearly set boundaries of this is not your fucking business.