Two years after the Fairphone 4 and following the release of some audio products like the Fairbuds XL, the Dutch company is back with a new repairable phone: the Fairphone 5. It looks and feels a lot like the Fairphone 4, but it adds choice upgrades across the board, making it the most modular and also most modern-looking repairable phone from the company yet.

The design is largely unchanged compared to the Fairphone 4, but the improvements that the company did make go a long way: The teardrop notch and the LCD screen is finally gone, with an ordinary punch-hole selfie and an OLED taking its place. Otherwise, you’re looking at an aluminum frame, a triangular camera array, and a removable back cover. Here, the company brought back its signature translucent back cover next to two black and blue variants. The dimensions and weight has been reduced ever-so-slightly compared to the predecessor.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 59 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 50 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Everybody seems to care about headphone jacks, nobody seems to care about Fairphone's former stance to focus on keeping their existing models usable long term rather than produce a new phone every year and incentivise a race to the latest model like every other brand does...

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    6.46" is too large a screen. My pixel 6a is barely small enough. Also, bring back the headphone jack.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago

    I was pained to move to iOS when my kids decided they wanted iPhones and I needed one to manage their parental controls, but boy do I love the form factor of the 12 mini I got.

    Everything out there seems so huge now.

    I’d love to have more options for smaller, manageable phones, especially as my workplace have given out work iPhones now, I could realistically go back to Android again come upgrade time as I can manage their accounts with that.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 32 points 2 years ago (17 children)

    It really does surprise me how so many people (at least on Reddit and Lemmy) care so deeply about a headphone jack.

  • source
  • hideshow 25 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (4 children)
    1. No internal battery means it's not a product with a built-in obsolence period (which is fairly short, 3-5 years)
    2. Most of the better audio gear are all wired
    3. I mean, it's simple economics: Not paying for all the extra stuff to make it wireless means you get better value for audio quality
    4. Many people here are enthusiasts in tech and hardware, we likely have more than a few devices. Switching between devices with BT is a fucking PITA.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [–] 34 points 2 years ago (7 children)

    Most of the issue stems from annoying dongles that wired headphone users typically don't want to carry.

    The situation with fairphone is especially infuriating however, as omitting the headphone jack goes against the whole point of fairphone IMO.

    Bluetooth headphones, as convenient as they are, have integrated lithium batteries, which are harmful for the environment. They also have a very short, finite lifespan. Despite these issues, fairphone removed the headphone jack on the fairphone 4 and 5, while simultaneously releasing true wireless Bluetooth earphones that are not repairable. Their whole brand is based on creating ethically sourced, repairable products, so offering an inherently unrepairable item for sale is rather disappointing. I am aware that they offer over ear headphones that are repairable, but I think they shouldn't sell true wireless earphones until they come up with a real repairable design.

    In contrast, there are wired headphones from the mid 1980s that are still functional and still sound amazing, even if they aren't as convenient to use. There are also modern wired headphones and IEMs (In-Ear Monitors) that have removable, standardized cables. This is great since the cable is what breaks on wired headphones 99% of the time.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • [–] 22 points 2 years ago

    I don't want to buy more shit I got to remember to charge when I already have a few nice 3.5mm headsets. I know its going to be dead every time I want to use it. I got to pair it every time I switch devices. It works on everything that has the right hole even if its older than your parents.

    Its just extra work unless its your daily driver.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 29 points 2 years ago (21 children)

    Qualcomm QCM6490

    No good for free software OSes then :-(

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Can you elaborate on why? Like, I'm not surprised, I just am not involved in this space enough to know why.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Proprietary drivers/firmware. Basically makes it impossible/very hard to develop custom ROMs/operating systems (the lack of openness makes it super hard to extend/modify/verify the software running on these chips).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    The drivers are well separated via HAL so you can absolutely make custom ROMs/OSes without changing those. The Android OS has way more code above the HAL layer than below. You can't however arbitrarily update the Linux kernel, modify the drivers or fix security issues found, beyond the security support window provided by Qualcomm.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)
    1. Manufacturers (e.g., Qualcomm, Samsung) won't return your call unless you buy in huge quantities, hundreds of thousands or millions of units.
    2. Lack of documentation.
    3. Information restricted by NDA.
    4. Non-free binaries required for lots of hardware.
    5. Generally lording over the market and exploiting their position, to the degree of anti-competitiveness, and as a consequence artificially extending the rein of non-free software in the mobile domain.
    6. Astonishingly poor quality of engineering.
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (20 replies)
    [–] 21 points 2 years ago (12 children)

    Low-end hardware and a pretty much closed CPU you can't do much with for 700 Euros? No, thank you.

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • load more comments (11 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Damn...

    They're gonna keep getting bigger, aren't they?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 17 points 2 years ago

    I really hope it does well, the business model really needs to change.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    Man I've never spent more than 300 bucks on any phone, fair or not. Isn't there something in the 150-300 category that's worth buying, more sustainable and de-googled/foss?

    I don't do high end shit with my phone. I just browse the web, take notes and do 2FA stuff. I don't need a 700€ phone for this, even considering the higher cost because of sustainability.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [+] 12 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 12 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    The major issue for me is availability, they don't sell the phone here, so if I buy through shipping services I can't buy replacement parts.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

    Is it available in the U.S. yet?

    recently launched in the U.S.

    Does anyone with a Fair phone have time to tell me how it compares to Pixel? I have loved all of my Google Pixel products to the point I have lived with them for 7 years since their launch.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 7 points 2 years ago (4 children)
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    According to CNET not as good as pixel, but it is honestly fine (not great, but definitely fine) in my eyes.

    https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/fairphone-5-review-the-phone-that-wants-to-save-the-world/

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Their promo video looks good. Though it is a promo video.

    My guess is that it won't have the bells and whistles of Samsung or Google Pixel devices. That doesn't really seem to be the goal with the device though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›