top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 200 points 2 years ago (6 children)

Activists don't need the personal information of people they disagree with. Terrorists do, charge them accordingly.

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 113 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    10 years seems pretty low for this tbh

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 81 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    What a clusterfuck of a HIPAA violation.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    HIPAA seems to be one of the rare laws that actually results in significant damages. Will be interesting to see the size of the fine on this.

    Likely the hospital gets hit as well for allowing him access to medical records on patients he had nothing to do with. Shouldn't have been possible in the first place.

    This guy's career is over. I'm sure he'll do okay financially by selling ivermectin to bigoted dimwits, but I doubt he will be practicing real medicine ever again.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago* (4 children)

    Shouldn’t have been possible in the first place.

    I have yet to see a EHR that has access restrictions that would prevent this. Instead it's just logged and if irregular enough you get to have a hostile conversation that could lead to this.

    Edit:

    Haim, a Dallas surgeon, previously had done some work at Texas Children’s Hospital as part of his residency. The indictment against Haim alleges that in 2023, he asked to reactivate his login there to access information on pediatric patients not under his care, including names, attending physicians and treatment codes, then turned over the information to a media contact.

    Okay, that's just dumb. Texas Children's Hospital is going to get fucked over this. Not only did he not have admitting privileges, he didn't even fucking remotely work there. This isn't just a HIPPA violation, it's straight up fraud.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago* (1 child)
  • [–] 40 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    And we are revoking his license, right?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 40 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Facing possible jail in Texas isn't exactly a price being paid, is it?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Compromising PII is a hipaa violation, that isn’t taken lightly anywhere. He may not get the full 10 years but he will be slapped for this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    What I mean is even if he was facing the death penalty or 1 billion years in prison, he hasn't paid, has he. The penalty has been added to cart.

    Tangent: I have no faith in the American justice system, much less in any red state's "justice" system. He'll get slapped...on the wrist...using some mental gymnastics about whistleblowers or something like that.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 30 points 2 years ago* (last edited 5 months ago)
    [–] 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Just 10 years for violating HIPAA? I would thing it would be longer

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    The people that are desperately clinging onto the hope that this is any kind of victory needs a reality check.

    In the extremely unlikely scenario that he actually gets jail time they'll be high-fiving him all the way in - and you better know that any parole hearing he's going to get (which will probably be sooner rather than later) will be staffed by people who think exactly the same way he does.

    Hierarchy is the bedrock of reactionary politics - and it doesn't get any more hierarchical than the (so-called) "justice system."

  • source
  • [+] 17 points 2 years ago*
    [–] 16 points 2 years ago*

    Anti-trans doctor

    First guess was Florida, second was Texas.

  • source
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    For what possible purpose would he need medical records? It can't be money surely.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    For finding and eliminating the “vermin” the orange shit stain keeps screaming about.

    So, are all conservatives blood lusting, self centered, self absorbed ass holes?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's not about the details of care, but the general information on who is transgender and who was providing or was involved in the care.

    With the purpose to "cause malicious harm" as the article says. Which means, they will harass and try to scare involved parties into hiding, leaving or stopping to provide care.

    This Conservative activist already published the information to discredit the children's hospital, create a scandal on how they are harming children with the goal that the hospital will stop providing care in fear of bad press.

    Their goal is to scare every trans person back deep into the closet (or to leave) and to scare all possible care out of existence, even when legal.

    The basic motive is HATE. Plain and simple. Hate of that what is different and the need to control the people around them to live by their beliefs and moral standards.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    I hope for everything he deserves and more, conservatives are freaks of nature.

  • source
  • What's ironic is that THE BOYS AMZN SPOILER

    Tap for spoilerThe Boys on Amazon predicted this

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›