all 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 73 points 2 years ago*
[–] 64 points 2 years ago

This is the kind of encouragement I need, comrade 🫡

  • source
  • [–] 58 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    So does this mean my open source project CI/CD pipeline is a step towards fully automated luxury gay space communism?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 57 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    「Bolshevik chorus intensifies 」

    When you program closed source, you invite spies and saboteurs to utilize your exploits.

    When you enforce IP holdings, you steal from the public.

    We are locked into surviving by capitalism the same way we are locked into commuting by car.

    WE HAVE NOTHING TO LOSE BUT OUR CHAINS!

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Is your keyboard breeding Bolsheviks?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    That is a very interesting question. Are you asking because I used the 「 ... 」brackets?

    When I've posted on Lemmy before, the pointy brackets < ... > sometimes don't show, nor will anything in between them, so I chose a different set not knowing what they are.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Calling open source communism aside, capitalism and those who benefit the most from it probably absolutely HATE the largest open source projects because the more people use those, the less likely they are to use their telemetry based spy/bloatware.

    Imagine trying to make a paid video/audio file player in today's day and age and going up against the titan that is VLC. Or an audio editor/playback program in similar fashion to Audacity. Two of the biggest open source programs that I imagine just about anyone who has used a computer has probably heard of and/or used at some point.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    Well, Reaper is more popular with musicians than Audacity, and it follows the Winrar business model

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    I'd argue that Audacity (audio recording/editing/processing suite) is a little different niche than Reaper (full-fledged DAW). If your use case is "I'm doing a podcast and I need to do an audio recording from multiple mics and mix them down", Audacity is good enough that there's no point in paying extra for a DAW. If you're a musician and you need to mess nondestructively with recordings and MIDI and filters, then you know you need to go bigger.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    I sometimes wonder (with a deep, cold shudder) if someone somewhere could take this poster at face value. Someone so far removed from my own edifice of knowledge, experience and opinions, that this can be read as anything other than ironic satire.

    For example, some home-schooled children in Idaho or Arkansas, by parents made crazy by limbaugh and murdoch, then breitbart and infowars.

    The kind of people so clueless that they could bite off the hand that feeds them, voting republican while crying out "keep your dirty government hands off my Medicare", thinking that Medicare is a private enterprise... thingy... that's like... their birthright... and it's made by... angels, reading The Holy Bible or something... and that's... a sustainable business model for all involved?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    not sure if this referring to anything specifically but M$ has lots of open source stuff and also invests in Linux - just saying.

    https://opensource.microsoft.com/projects/

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Microsoft has tons of open source stuff and tons of support programs for open source projects.

    There are plenty of reasons to criticize Microsoft, but FOSS isn't one of them.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 31 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Yeah, now, and only because they lost and gave up. Some of us don't forgive past misdeeds so easily.

    Besides, even to this day, most (if not all) of their "support" for open source is about getting it to play more nicely with Windows or trying to prevent people who insist on using open source from jumping ship to Linux, not supporting it for its own sake.

    I'll believe Microsoft actually supports open source when they start porting things like Office or Flight Simulator to Linux, not before.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    Yeah but I think that this highlights something quite well: Open Source is inherently corporate. It was created as a branch from the free/libre software movement, to extract it's open development model and make it corporate-friendly

    "Open Source is just a corporate development model"

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    "Embrace, Extend, Extinquish"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If they're doing that, they're playing a very long game.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Are they, though? How many game studios did they just buy and immediately shutter? Have they ever NOT been involved in anti-competitive lawsuits?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    We're talking about open source software, not games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 2 years ago

    actually, communists program free/libre and reject open source as corporate 🤓
    /hj

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    This meme is so old that homie is rocking a G3 gum drop iMac.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Oh gee whiz, I'm glad I like communism then 😅

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 years ago

    That guy is coding open source software on a 1998 bondi blue iMac.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Might be red and blue but that fruit Mac is probably rockin’ Yellow Dog.

  • source
  • A spectre is haunting your computer

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago

    Microsoft advertising open source? Maybe open source isn't that good after all?

  • source
  • [+] 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 4 points 2 years ago

    that guy on the back sure does look like microsoft

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 years ago

    Programmers of the world, unite!

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    Remember: loose lips sink ships.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    If it's Microsoft telling us that then why does the computer look like an iMac?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 1 point 2 years ago