630
Open Source Rule (lemmy.dbzer0.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
47 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 10 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Well, Reaper is more popular with musicians than Audacity, and it follows the Winrar business model

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    I'd argue that Audacity (audio recording/editing/processing suite) is a little different niche than Reaper (full-fledged DAW). If your use case is "I'm doing a podcast and I need to do an audio recording from multiple mics and mix them down", Audacity is good enough that there's no point in paying extra for a DAW. If you're a musician and you need to mess nondestructively with recordings and MIDI and filters, then you know you need to go bigger.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent