all 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 46 points 3 years ago (1 child)

This feels less uplifting and more depressing that it ever got to this place to begin with...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    There is a special place in hell for the people who made up this law, and the people enforcing it.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I mean... what rational jury would vote to convict?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    I was going to say all white republican, but you said rational so never mind.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    Lol all it takes is 1 rational person to hang the jury. I mean what are the odds that the second jury will be all irrational people? They can't just keep trying the same case forever, eventually a judge will dismiss it. Or most likely, a new jury will have majority of rational people that will likely convince the rest to just acquit. Like who wants to sit there any longer than they have to? It's not like they're releasing a murder suspect.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 years ago (2 children)

    Jury nullification is something that more people need to use. If you don't agree with the law, as a juror you can always vote not guilty.

    Though if you talk about jury nullification they will not select you for jury duty.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child)

    What's jury nullification? I don't remember ever hearing that word. Anyways I'm voting non-guilty because I have a reasonable doubt. 😉

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 years ago (1 child)

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification_in_the_United_States

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jury_nullification

    Once you are on the jury it is your prerogative nay, your RESPONSIBILITY to use it when it is appropriate.

    A law criminalizing feeding the homeless is a perfect example of why jury nullification exists.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 3 years ago*

    Sorry, what I meant was that I would convieniently not remember this when I get asked about it during jury selection, then I might convieniently decide to vote non-guilty because I had a reasonable doubt. Totally not because I learned of jury nullification. Totally...

    Also it's not contempt of court since I "forgot" about it during jury selection. 😉

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 3 years ago

    Orphan crushing machine

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 3 years ago

    Wild they have enough officers to monitor each unhoused person to ensure they can ticket every time this happens.

  • source