▲ 291 ▼ Houston man ticketed for feeding unhoused found not guilty (www.chron.com) submitted 3 years ago by TheTango@lemmy.world to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world 14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] Vaggumon@lemmy.world 11 points 3 years ago (1 child) I was going to say all white republican, but you said rational so never mind. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Lol all it takes is 1 rational person to hang the jury. I mean what are the odds that the second jury will be all irrational people? They can't just keep trying the same case forever, eventually a judge will dismiss it. Or most likely, a new jury will have majority of rational people that will likely convince the rest to just acquit. Like who wants to sit there any longer than they have to? It's not like they're releasing a murder suspect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago (2 children) Jury nullification is something that more people need to use. If you don't agree with the law, as a juror you can always vote not guilty. Though if you talk about jury nullification they will not select you for jury duty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago That is why we have to talk about it out here, where they have no say in our speech.. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) What's jury nullification? I don't remember ever hearing that word. Anyways I'm voting non-guilty because I have a reasonable doubt. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification_in_the_United_States https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jury_nullification Once you are on the jury it is your prerogative nay, your RESPONSIBILITY to use it when it is appropriate. A law criminalizing feeding the homeless is a perfect example of why jury nullification exists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Sorry, what I meant was that I would convieniently not remember this when I get asked about it during jury selection, then I might convieniently decide to vote non-guilty because I had a reasonable doubt. Totally not because I learned of jury nullification. Totally... Also it's not contempt of court since I "forgot" about it during jury selection. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) Lol all it takes is 1 rational person to hang the jury. I mean what are the odds that the second jury will be all irrational people? They can't just keep trying the same case forever, eventually a judge will dismiss it. Or most likely, a new jury will have majority of rational people that will likely convince the rest to just acquit. Like who wants to sit there any longer than they have to? It's not like they're releasing a murder suspect. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago (2 children) Jury nullification is something that more people need to use. If you don't agree with the law, as a juror you can always vote not guilty. Though if you talk about jury nullification they will not select you for jury duty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago That is why we have to talk about it out here, where they have no say in our speech.. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) What's jury nullification? I don't remember ever hearing that word. Anyways I'm voting non-guilty because I have a reasonable doubt. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification_in_the_United_States https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jury_nullification Once you are on the jury it is your prerogative nay, your RESPONSIBILITY to use it when it is appropriate. A law criminalizing feeding the homeless is a perfect example of why jury nullification exists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Sorry, what I meant was that I would convieniently not remember this when I get asked about it during jury selection, then I might convieniently decide to vote non-guilty because I had a reasonable doubt. Totally not because I learned of jury nullification. Totally... Also it's not contempt of court since I "forgot" about it during jury selection. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.world 12 points 3 years ago (2 children) Jury nullification is something that more people need to use. If you don't agree with the law, as a juror you can always vote not guilty. Though if you talk about jury nullification they will not select you for jury duty. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago That is why we have to talk about it out here, where they have no say in our speech.. permalink fedilink source parent [–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) What's jury nullification? I don't remember ever hearing that word. Anyways I'm voting non-guilty because I have a reasonable doubt. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification_in_the_United_States https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jury_nullification Once you are on the jury it is your prerogative nay, your RESPONSIBILITY to use it when it is appropriate. A law criminalizing feeding the homeless is a perfect example of why jury nullification exists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Sorry, what I meant was that I would convieniently not remember this when I get asked about it during jury selection, then I might convieniently decide to vote non-guilty because I had a reasonable doubt. Totally not because I learned of jury nullification. Totally... Also it's not contempt of court since I "forgot" about it during jury selection. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 7 points 3 years ago That is why we have to talk about it out here, where they have no say in our speech.. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 3 points 3 years ago* (1 child) What's jury nullification? I don't remember ever hearing that word. Anyways I'm voting non-guilty because I have a reasonable doubt. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification_in_the_United_States https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jury_nullification Once you are on the jury it is your prerogative nay, your RESPONSIBILITY to use it when it is appropriate. A law criminalizing feeding the homeless is a perfect example of why jury nullification exists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Sorry, what I meant was that I would convieniently not remember this when I get asked about it during jury selection, then I might convieniently decide to vote non-guilty because I had a reasonable doubt. Totally not because I learned of jury nullification. Totally... Also it's not contempt of court since I "forgot" about it during jury selection. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Captain_Patchy@lemmy.world 4 points 3 years ago (1 child) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jury_nullification_in_the_United_States https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/jury_nullification Once you are on the jury it is your prerogative nay, your RESPONSIBILITY to use it when it is appropriate. A law criminalizing feeding the homeless is a perfect example of why jury nullification exists. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Sorry, what I meant was that I would convieniently not remember this when I get asked about it during jury selection, then I might convieniently decide to vote non-guilty because I had a reasonable doubt. Totally not because I learned of jury nullification. Totally... Also it's not contempt of court since I "forgot" about it during jury selection. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent
[–] WtfEvenIsExistence@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago* Sorry, what I meant was that I would convieniently not remember this when I get asked about it during jury selection, then I might convieniently decide to vote non-guilty because I had a reasonable doubt. Totally not because I learned of jury nullification. Totally... Also it's not contempt of court since I "forgot" about it during jury selection. 😉 permalink fedilink source parent