top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 178 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Awesome, do META next please!

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 69 points 2 years ago

    Even better

  • source
  • [–] 60 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    There will be a rush of US startups to replace it, and they will all be stage 1 enshittification, so they might actually be good for a while, like TikTok once was.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 56 points 2 years ago

    If they said or implied anything else, they would lose all leverage. The public couldn't care less about who owns tiktok, so they need people to think they'll lose it to have any public support.

  • source
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (38 children)
    load more comments (38 replies)
    [–] 45 points 2 years ago (2 children)
  • [–] 19 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    It's probably not a bluff. They've pretty much saturated the U.S. market; there's not much room left to grow here. It would make more sense to focus their efforts on growing in other regions where they have plenty of headroom to increase their userbase and monetization. Depending on how things play out, they could match their current revenue in a matter of years and still have room left to grow. There's also the potential to re-enter the U.S. market down the line. Why would they throw that all away and essentially create their own competitor by selling their core technology and diluting/confusing their brand with whatever U.S. company they sell to?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 2 years ago

    I'd think the fact they've saturated the US market is exactly why it'd be too valuable to give up. They'd lose a ton of revenue, tanking their valuation. They may be better off selling. From there they could prob just clone it and promote a competing service in those unclaimed markets using a portion of the extra sale price they get for maintaining (and selling a product with) US market dominance

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 14 points 2 years ago

    They’ve pretty much saturated the U.S. market; there’s not much room left to grow here

    That... doesn't make sense to me. So because there's no room to grow, they pull out of the U.S. and lose the likely ~$1 bil spent on digital stickers for live streamers?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 37 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

    US should call their bluff. If Tiktok gets banned, people will complain for a little bit until people forget and move on to what's next. Why doesn't an American company make something that's practically identical? People will be all desperate for their 5 second dopamine rush that they will download anything.

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 36 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    It's Vine time! What? Just... just bring it back. Call it "Kudzu" or some crap if Elon Musk owns the rights to Vine.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 2 years ago

    Could they please pull from Europe, too?

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    We tried that with facebook in the eu. Didn’t work

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 25 points 2 years ago

    Google knew youtube shorts didn't stand a chance in a fair market.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    If the Chinese government is behind this, it's a great play. Having Joe Biden be "the guy who banned tik tok" would severely undermine his election chances.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (3 children)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 20 points 2 years ago (4 children)

    If money wasn't the point, then influence was. Congress is right to shut them down.

    Foreign owned, FARA-unregistered influence operations have never been a facet of "free speech" in the USA.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 15 points 2 years ago
    [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Bye Felecia

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 2 years ago

    Even better

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Okay bye Felicia

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 years ago

    Nice hope they won't budge.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    First, negotiations are not yet over, so they’re hoping courts overturn the ban.

    Second, TikTok is very popular outside the US too, though 40% of ad revenue is in the US. They’d survive.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [+] 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
    [removed by mod]
  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›